Abstract
The use of both transmission electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy have provided tremendous advances to our understanding of autophagosome formation in baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the last decade, parallel techniques have been developed for both types of microscopy that allow the quantification of the rate of autophagosome formation. Importantly, these techniques, unlike other measures of total autophagic flux, allow a researcher to distinguish between effects on autophagosome size and autophagosome number. This has led to the discovery that certain autophagy proteins (e.g., Atg8) contribute primarily to the control of autophagosome size, whereas others (e.g., Atg9) are principally involved in controlling autophagosome number, suggesting different roles for these proteins in the autophagosome formation process.
In this chapter, we present two methods for quantifying autophagosome formation in yeast. One, based on electron microscopy analysis of autophagic bodies in the vacuole, can give estimates of both autophagosome size and number. The other, based on live-cell imaging of growing autophagosomes labeled with GFP-Atg8, can provide information on the rate of autophagosome formation. Together they provide a robust toolbox for analyzing the roles of different proteins in the process of autophagosome formation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eskelinen E-L, Reggiori F, Baba M et al (2011) Seeing is believing: the impact of electron microscopy on autophagy research. Autophagy 7:935–956. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.7.9.15760
Takeshige K, Baba M, Tsuboi S et al (1992) Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction. J Cell Biol 119(2):301–311
Baba M, Takeshige K, Baba N, Ohsumi Y (1994) Ultrastructural analysis of the autophagic process in yeast: detection of autophagosomes and their characterization. J Cell Biol 124:903–913
Baba M, Osumi M, Scott SV et al (1997) Two distinct pathways for targeting proteins from the cytoplasm to the vacuole/lysosome. J Cell Biol 139(7):1687–1695
He C, Song H, Yorimitsu T et al (2006) Recruitment of Atg9 to the preautophagosomal structure by Atg11 is essential for selective autophagy in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 175:925–935. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200606084
Baba M, Tomonaga S, Suzuki M et al (2019) A nuclear membrane-derived structure associated with Atg8 is involved in the sequestration of selective cargo, the Cvt complex, during autophagosome formation in yeast. Autophagy 15:423–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2018.1525475
Gómez-Sánchez R, Rose J, Guimarães R et al (2018) Atg9 establishes Atg2-dependent contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum and phagophores. J Cell Biol 217:2743–2763. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201710116
Noda T, Klionsky DJ (2008) Chapter 3. The quantitative Pho8Δ60 assay of nonspecific autophagy. Methods Enzymol 451:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03203-5
Guimaraes RS, Delorme-Axford E, Klionsky DJ, Reggiori F (2015) Assays for the biochemical and ultrastructural measurement of selective and nonselective types of autophagy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 75:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.11.023
Torggler R, Papinski D, Kraft C (2017) Assays to monitor autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 6(3):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6030023
Xie Z, Nair U, Klionsky DJ (2008) Atg8 controls phagophore expansion during autophagosome formation. Mol Biol Cell 19:3290–3298. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-12-1292
Nakatogawa H, Ichimura Y, Ohsumi Y (2007) Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation, mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell 130:165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2007.05.021
Jin M, He D, Backues SK et al (2014) Transcriptional regulation by Pho23 modulates the frequency of autophagosome formation. Curr Biol 24:1314–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.048
Legakis JE, Yen W-L, Klionsky DJ (2007) A cycling protein complex required for selective autophagy. Autophagy 3:422–432. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.4129
Tucker KA, Reggiori F, Dunn WA, Klionsky DJ (2003) Atg23 is essential for the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway and efficient autophagy but not pexophagy. J Biol Chem 278:48445–48452. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M309238200
Yao Z, Delorme-Axford E, Backues SK, Klionsky DJ (2015) Atg41/Icy2 regulates autophagosome formation. Autophagy 11(12):2288–2299. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2015.1107692
Feng Y, Backues SK, Baba M et al (2016) Phosphorylation of Atg9 regulates movement to the phagophore assembly site and the rate of autophagosome formation. Autophagy 12(4):648–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2016.1157237
Cawthon H, Chakraborty R, Roberts JR, Backues SK (2018) Control of autophagosome size and number by Atg7. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 503:651–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBRC.2018.06.056
Xie Z, Nair U, Geng J et al (2009) Indirect estimation of the area density of Atg8 on the phagophore. Autophagy 5:217–220. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.5.2.7201
Backues SK, Chen D, Ruan J et al (2014) Estimating the size and number of autophagic bodies by electron microscopy. Autophagy 10:155–164
Suzuki K, Kirisako T, Kamada Y et al (2001) The pre-autophagosomal structure organized by concerted functions of APG genes is essential for autophagosome formation. EMBO J 20:5971–5981. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.21.5971
Kim J, Huang W-P, Stromhaug PE, Klionsky DJ (2002) Convergence of multiple autophagy and cytoplasm to vacuole targeting components to a perivacuolar membrane compartment prior to de novo vesicle formation. J Biol Chem 277:763–773. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109134200
Segarra VA, Boettner DR, Lemmon SK (2015) Atg27 tyrosine sorting motif is important for its trafficking and Atg9 localization. Traffic 16:365–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12253
Yamamoto H, Kakuta S, Watanabe TM et al (2012) Atg9 vesicles are an important membrane source during early steps of autophagosome formation. J Cell Biol 198:219–233. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201202061
Backues SK, Orban DP, Bernard A et al (2015) Atg23 and Atg27 act at the early stages of Atg9 trafficking in S. cerevisiae. Traffic 16:172–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12240
Suzuki K, Kubota Y, Sekito T, Ohsumi Y (2007) Hierarchy of Atg proteins in pre-autophagosomal structure organization. Genes Cells 12:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01050.x
Reggiori F, Tucker KA, Stromhaug PE, Klionsky DJ (2004) The Atg1-Atg13 complex regulates Atg9 and Atg23 retrieval transport from the pre-autophagosomal structure. Dev Cell 6:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00402-7
Cheong H, Yorimitsu T, Reggiori F et al (2005) Atg17 regulates the magnitude of the autophagic response. Mol Biol Cell 16:3438–3453. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-10-0894
Feuerverger A, Menzinger M, Atwood HL, Cooper RL (2000) Statistical methods for assessing the dimensions of synaptic vesicles in nerve terminals. J Neurosci Methods 103:181–190
Bernard A, Jin M, González-Rodríguez P et al (2015) Rph1/KDM4 mediates nutrient-limitation signaling that leads to the transcriptional induction of autophagy. Curr Biol 25:546–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.049
Klionsky DJ (2011) For the last time, it is GFP-Atg8, not Atg8-GFP (and the same goes for LC3). Autophagy 7:1093–1094. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.7.10.15492
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Backues, S.K., Klionsky, D.J. (2022). Quantification of Autophagosome Size and Formation Rate by Electron and Fluorescence Microscopy in Baker’s Yeast. In: Loos, B., Wong, E. (eds) Imaging and Quantifying Neuronal Autophagy. Neuromethods, vol 171. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1589-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1589-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1588-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1589-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols