Abstract
Current computer architectures, coupled with state-of-the-art molecular dynamics simulation software, facilitate the in-depth study of large biomolecular systems at high levels of detail. However, biological phenomena take place at various time and length scales and as a result a multiscale approach must be adopted. One such approach is coarse-graining, where biochemical accuracy is sacrificed for computational efficiency. Here, we present a practical guide to setting up and carrying out coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shaw DE, Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K et al (2010) Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 330:341–346. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1187409
Marrink SJ, Risselada HJ, Yefimov S et al (2007) The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 111:7812–7824. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp071097f
Monticelli L, Kandasamy SK, Periole X et al (2008) The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: extension to proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 4:819–834. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct700324x
de Jong DH, Singh G, Bennett WFD et al (2013) Improved parameters for the Martini coarse-grained protein force field. J Chem Theory Comput 9:687–697. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300646g
Marrink SJ, de Vries AH, Alan EM (2003) Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP036508G
Arnarez C, Uusitalo JJ, Masman MF et al (2015) Dry Martini, a coarse-grained force field for lipid membrane simulations with implicit solvent. J Chem Theory Comput 11:260–275. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500477k
Uusitalo JJ, Ingólfsson HI, Akhshi P et al (2015) Martini coarse-grained force field: extension to DNA. J Chem Theory Comput 11:3932–3945. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00286
Uusitalo JJ, Ingólfsson HI, Marrink SJ, Faustino I (2017) Martini coarse-grained force field: extension to RNA. Biophys J 113:246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BPJ.2017.05.043
Machado MR, Barrera EE, Klein F et al (2019) The SIRAH 2.0 force field: altius, fortius, citius. J Chem Theory Comput 15:2719–2733. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00006
Barrera EE, Machado MR, Pantano S (2019) Fat SIRAH: coarse-grained phospholipids to explore membrane–protein dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 15:5674–5688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00435
Orsi M, Essex JW (2011) The ELBA force field for coarse-grain modeling of lipid membranes. PLoS One 6:e28637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028637
Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R (1995) GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 91:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E
Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R et al (2015) GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001
Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B et al (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 26:1701–1718. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20291
Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7:306–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s008940100045
Pronk S, Páll S, Schulz R et al (2013) GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29:845–854. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055
Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435–447. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct700301q
Fiser A, Šali A (2003) Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Methods Enzymol 374:461–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(03)74020-8
Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S et al (2018) SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W296–W303. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky427
Shen M-Y, Sali A (2006) Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 15:2507–2524. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.062416606
Benkert P, Tosatto SCE, Schomburg D (2008) QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins 71:261–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21715
Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI et al (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117:5179–5197. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00124a002
Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K et al (2015) ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J Chem Theory Comput 11. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255
Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W et al (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26:1781–1802. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20289
Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/JCPH.1995.1039
Periole X, Cavalli M, Marrink S-J, Ceruso MA (2009) Combining an elastic network with a coarse-grained molecular force field: structure, dynamics, and intermolecular recognition. J Chem Theory Comput 5:2531–2543. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct9002114
Qi Y, Ingólfsson HI, Cheng X et al (2015) CHARMM-GUI Martini maker for coarse-grained simulations with the Martini force field. J Chem Theory Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00513
Hsu P-C, Bruininks BMH, Jefferies D et al (2017) CHARMM-GUI Martini maker for modeling and simulation of complex bacterial membranes with lipopolysaccharides. J Comput Chem 38:2354–2363. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24895
Wassenaar TA, Ingólfsson HI, Böckmann RA et al (2015) Computational lipidomics with insane: a versatile tool for generating custom membranes for molecular simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 11:2144–2155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00209
Glass WG, Duncan AL, Biggin PC (2020) Computational investigation of voltage-gated sodium channel β3 subunit dynamics. Front Mol Biosci 7:40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.00040
Duncan AL, Reddy T, Koldsø H et al (2017) Protein crowding and lipid complexity influence the nanoscale dynamic organization of ion channels in cell membranes. Sci Rep 7:16647. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16865-6
Chavent M, Duncan AL, Rassam P et al (2018) How nanoscale protein interactions determine the mesoscale dynamic organisation of bacterial outer membrane proteins. Nat Commun 9:2846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05255-9
Holdbrook DA, Huber RG, Piggot TJ et al (2016) Dynamics of crowded vesicles: local and global responses to membrane composition. PLoS One 11:e0156963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156963
Jefferies D, Khalid S (2020) To infect or not to infect: molecular determinants of bacterial outer membrane vesicle internalization by host membranes. J Mol Biol 432:1251–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMB.2020.01.008
Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF et al (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:3684–3690. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448118
Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M (2007) Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys 126:014101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2408420
Parrinello M, Rahman A (1980) Crystal structure and pair potentials: a molecular-dynamics study. Phys Rev Lett 45:1196–1199. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1196
Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52:7182–7190. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328693
Jones JE (1924) On the determination of molecular fields. I. From the variation of the viscosity of a gas with temperature. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 106:441–462. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1924.0081
Jones JE (1924) On the determination of molecular fields. II. From the equation of state of a gas. Proc R Soc London A 106:463–477. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1924.0082
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: an Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98:10089–10092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464397
Krieger E, Vriend G (2015) New ways to boost molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 36:996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23899
Wassenaar TA, Pluhackova K, Böckmann RA et al (2014) Going backward: a flexible geometric approach to reverse transformation from coarse grained to atomistic models. J Chem Theory Comput 10:676–690. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400617g
MacKerell AD, Banavali N, Foloppe N (2000) Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids. Biopolymers 56:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0282(2000)56:4<257::AID-BIP10029>3.0.CO;2-W
Huang J, MacKerell AD (2013) CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data. J Comput Chem 34:2135–2145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23354
MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M et al (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102:3586–3616. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp973084f
Maciejewski A, Pasenkiewicz-Gierula M, Cramariuc O et al (2014) Refined OPLS all-atom force field for saturated phosphatidylcholine bilayers at full hydration. J Phys Chem B 118:4571–4581. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5016627
Ulmschneider JP, Ulmschneider MB (2009) United atom lipid parameters for combination with the optimized potentials for liquid simulations all-atom force field. J Chem Theory Comput 5:1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900086b
van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising AA et al (1996) Biomolecular simulation: the GROMOS96 manual and user guide. Vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, Zürich
Schuler LD, Daura X, van Gunsteren WF (2001) An improved GROMOS96 force field for aliphatic hydrocarbons in the condensed phase. J Comput Chem 22:1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.1078
van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC (1987) Groningen molecular simulation (GROMOS) library manual. Biomos, Groningen
Jo S, Cheng X, Lee J et al (2017) CHARMM-GUI 10 years for biomolecular modeling and simulation. J Comput Chem 38:1114–1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24660
Ghahremanpour MM, Arab SS, Aghazadeh SB et al (2014) MemBuilder: a web-based graphical interface to build heterogeneously mixed membrane bilayers for the GROMACS biomolecular simulation program. Bioinformatics 30:439–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt680
Balabin IVMD membrane plugin. https://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/plugins/membrane
Doerr S, Giorgino T, Martínez-Rosell G et al (2017) High-throughput automated preparation and simulation of membrane proteins with HTMD. J Chem Theory Comput 13:4003–4011. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00480
Wu X, Brooks BR (2003) Self-guided Langevin dynamics simulation method. Chem Phys Lett 381:512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPLETT.2003.10.013
Orsi M, Ding W, Palaiokostas M (2014) Direct mixing of atomistic solutes and coarse-grained water. J Chem Theory Comput 10:4684–4693. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500065k
Genheden S, Essex JW (2015) A simple and transferable all-atom/coarse-grained hybrid model to study membrane processes. J Chem Theory Comput 11:4749–4759. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00469
Genheden S (2018) ELBA. https://github.com/SGenheden/Elba
Dahl ACE, Chavent M, Sansom MSP (2012) Bendix: intuitive helix geometry analysis and abstraction. Bioinformatics 28:2193. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTS357
Lv Z, Tek A, Da Silva F et al (2013) Game on, science – how video game technology may help biologists tackle visualization challenges. PLoS One 8:e57990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057990
Doutreligne S, Gageat C, Cragnolini T et al (2015) UnityMol: interactive and ludic visual manipulation of coarse-grained RNA and other biomolecules. In: 2015 IEEE 1st international workshop on virtual and augmented reality for molecular science (VARMS@IEEEVR). IEEE, New York, NY, pp 1–6
Doutreligne S, Cragnolini T, Pasquali S et al (2014) UnityMol: interactive scientific visualization for integrative biology. In: 2014 IEEE 4th symposium on large data analysis and visualization (LDAV). IEEE, New York, NY, pp 109–110
Bereau T, Kremer K (2015) Automated parametrization of the coarse-grained Martini force field for small organic molecules. J Chem Theory Comput 11:2783–2791. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00056
Graham JA, Essex JW, Khalid S (2017) PyCGTOOL: automated generation of coarse-grained molecular dynamics models from atomistic trajectories. J Chem Inf Model 57:650–656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00096
Atsmon-Raz Y, Tieleman DP (2017) Parameterization of palmitoylated cysteine, farnesylated cysteine, geranylgeranylated cysteine, and myristoylated glycine for the Martini force field. J Phys Chem B 121:11132–11143. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10175
Acknowledgments
The authors thanks Matthieu Chavent for details of UnityMol.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Glass, W.G. et al. (2021). Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Membrane Proteins: A Practical Guide. In: Schmidt-Krey, I., Gumbart, J.C. (eds) Structure and Function of Membrane Proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2302. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1394-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1394-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1393-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1394-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols