Abstract
Chemotherapy for endometrial cancer has evolved over the past two decades, with drug combinations convincingly showing to have a role in the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. Agents with established antitumor activity include doxorubicin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel. A combination of paclitaxel with the cisplatin analog carboplatin is currently the most commonly used regimen for first-line treatment of metastatic disease. Questions remain about the contribution of these regimens in adjuvant settings, about the role of drug therapy beyond first-line treatments, and about integration of targeted agents.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Advanced endometrial cancer is associated with adverse outcomes compared to early-stage disease, with a 5-year survival of 59.6 % for stage III disease and 28.6 % for stage IV disease. The prognosis, however, is impacted by the degree of tumor differentiation and histology. Women with stage III disease and grade 1 adenocarcinomas have an 83 % 5-year survival compared to 48 % for women with grade 3 adenocarcinomas. Similarly, papillary serous and clear cell histologies are well-described poor prognostic indicators associated with decreased survival, comparable to that of ovarian cancer. SEER data suggests that the 5-year survival for patients with stage III papillary serous endometrial cancer is 33.3 % and 18.3 % for stage IV, compared to 66.9 % and 36.8 % for stage III and IV endometrioid tumors, respectively (all grades) [1].
Recurrent endometrial cancer presents with differing patterns ranging from localized to diffuse, and involvement of nodal and visceral areas. Therapeutic options vary depending on whether the metastatic focus is in a previously irradiated field or not. The choice of chemotherapy in recurrent endometrial cancer, particularly in papillary serous tumors, is largely extrapolated from the ovarian cancer literature. Similarly to ovarian cancer, recurrences can be categorized as platinum-sensitive versus platinum-resistant depending on their temporal relationship to the completion of a previous platinum-containing treatment. This status provides a guide to the selection of the chemotherapeutic agent of choice; however, response rates are generally lower than those observed in recurrent ovarian cancer. Chemotherapy in this setting is palliative and mindfulness of the patient’s quality of life while undergoing treatment is imperative in any therapeutic intervention.
Development of Systemic Therapies
The systemic treatment of endometrial carcinoma was first developed around progestins and doxorubicin and then mostly evolved from phase III studies by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) that have been performed since the 1970s. GOG 122, the first randomized phase III study demonstrating the superiority of chemotherapy (doxorubicin plus cisplatin, AP) over radiation (whole-abdominal radiation, WAI) in endometrial cancer, served as a powerful stimulus for extending the use of adjuvant systemic therapy for this disease. In GOG 122, women with stage III and low-volume (<2 cm residual disease after debulking surgery) stage IV endometrial carcinoma were randomized to receive WAI with a pelvic boost or AP chemotherapy with no radiotherapy. Seventy-five percent of women had stage III disease. Twenty percent had serous tumors. The hazard ratio for progression was 0.71 favoring AP (95 % CI, 0.55–0.91; p < 0.01). Women with both stage III and stage IV disease appeared to benefit from treatment. No prognostic feature including age, substage, or histology predicted lack of benefit from chemotherapy [2].
The adoption of chemotherapy as a preferred modality over pelvic irradiation was initially controversial. An Italian randomized phase III trial of lower risk patients compared to GOG 122 demonstrated no difference in PFS or OS between adjuvant chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy at 95-month follow-up. The study did demonstrate fewer distant relapses in the chemotherapy group and local relapses in the radiotherapy group [3]. The Japanese GOG reported similar findings and no difference when comparing cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus whole pelvic radiotherapy in patients with stage IC–IIIC endometrioid adenocarcinoma [4].
Integration of Chemotherapy and Radiation for Early-Stage Disease
The results of the Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO), European Organization for Research and Treatment Center (EORTC), and ILIADE-III (MaNGO group) trials randomizing women to receive pelvic radiation therapy with and without chemotherapy were published together. Several different chemotherapy regimens were allowed including doxorubicin, cisplatin, and carboplatin–paclitaxel. The pooled results including 534 evaluable patients with surgically resected high-risk FIGO stage I–III endometrial cancers showed that combined modality treatment was associated with a 36 % reduction in the risk of relapse or death (HR 0.64, CI 0.41–0.99, p = 0.04). The pooled results also demonstrate an improvement in the cancer-specific survival (HR 0.55, CI 0.35–0.88, p = 0.01) [5]. The study concluded that addition of chemotherapy to radiation improves PFS in endometrial cancer patients with no postoperative residual tumor and a high-risk profile.
Many women with endometrial cancer are elderly (median age at diagnosis is 60–65 years) and dose-intense regimens need to be approached cautiously. GOG 184 randomly assigned women with stage III and IV disease who underwent volume-directed or involved-field radiation therapy to chemotherapy containing either doxorubicin plus cisplatin or doxorubicin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel. Both arms required granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support given limited hematologic reserve following RT. The study concluded that addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin and cisplatin was not associated with an improvement in recurrence-free survival but was associated with increased toxicity [6]. A recently published review by the Cochrane Library pooling the results of four major randomized controlled trials [2,3,4, 6] concluded that there is moderate-quality evidence that chemotherapy increases survival time after primary surgery in endometrial cancer by approximately 25 % relative to radiotherapy in stage III and IV disease. There is insufficient evidence at this time relative to the risks and benefits of adjuvant chemo-radiation versus chemotherapy alone in this setting [7]. In an attempt to answer this important question, the GOG has an ongoing phase III study which randomizes women with optimally cytoreduced advanced-stage endometrial cancer to carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without tumor volume-directed irradiation preceding the chemotherapy (GOG 258).
Chemotherapy for Metastatic or Recurrent Disease
The amount of residual disease after surgery for advanced endometrial cancer has an impact on median survival and progression-free interval [8,9,10,11,12,13]. For women who present with extensive metastatic disease and/or are not candidates for surgical therapy, chemotherapy is a mainstay of treatment. Stage III–IV endometrial cancer is comprised of a diverse patient population with a small proportion of women with well-differentiated endometrioid cancers and a larger proportion of high-risk disease subtypes such as uterine papillary serous carcinoma, clear-cell carcinomas, or carcinosarcoma of the uterus.
The overall poor prognosis of this group is highlighted by the Cochrane Library meta-analysis comparing different treatment strategies in this population. The review discusses the findings of 14 randomized clinical trials and offers multiple comparisons: administration of multi-agent combinations (“more intensive”) versus fewer agents (“less intensive”), comparison across different chemotherapy doublets, and a comparison across different single chemotherapeutic agents. The conclusions are sobering. Compared with the administration of “less intensive” regimens, the use of “more intensive” regimens (eight trials including 1519 patients) resulted in improved PFS from 6 to 7 months (HR 0.82, CI 0.74–0.90) and OS from 9 to 10.5 months (HR 0.86, CI 0.77–0.96). Trials that compared doxorubicin (plus or minus cisplatin) with or without additional drugs favored the arms incorporating additional chemotherapy at the cost of additional toxicity. No single agent or combination chemotherapy regimen or schedule stood out.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an interesting strategy that allows the identification of chemosensitive disease that is more likely to benefit from debulking surgery when compared to chemoresistant disease. It also provides a feasible up-front strategy for patients with unresectable disease or who are not otherwise candidates for cytoreductive surgery due to medical comorbidities. Given the considerable risk of postoperative complications associated with primary debulking reported at 36–39 % in the endometrial cancer population [10, 11], coupled with the older age and increased medical comorbidities associated with this disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a reasonable first approach in patients with advanced disease. In a prospective clinical trial including 30 patients who received 3–4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to an attempt at cytoreduction, the Leuven Group concluded that the degree of tumor regression after NACT for advanced-stage endometrial cancer was a new prognostic marker. In their study, carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy achieved a response rate of 74 %, with 2 complete responses and 20 partial responses. They did not operate on patients with progression of disease. Their optimal cytoreduction rate was 80 % (≤1 cm) with a low postoperative morbidity rate [14].
The most active drugs in women with no prior chemotherapy are platinum agents, taxanes, and anthracyclines, all producing response rates of 20–30 % as single agents. Combination chemotherapy has produced higher response rates and improved survival in randomized trials. Several combination regimens have been tested in phase III trials and are summarized in Table 1. Based on phase II evidence reporting response rates between 40 and 74 % at acceptable toxicity for carboplatin and paclitaxel in both a chemo-naïve and a pretreated population, this combination was further studied in the phase III setting [14, 22,23,24,25]. Notably, in GOG 209, which utilized a non-inferiority design, carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) as a doublet was not inferior to paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (TAP) with a more favorable toxicity profile, leading to its adoption as the standard doublet moving forward in clinical trials [21]. Interestingly, both treatment arms were associated with more than doubled median OS compared with previous studies. The marked improvement in median OS when compared to previous studies is likely to be multifactorial and reflect differential inclusion of a group of patients with improved prognosis, improvements in subsequent therapy, wider availability of imaging studies, and possible earlier detection of recurrences [26].
Single-Agent Chemotherapy
A large number of cytotoxic agents have been tested in endometrial carcinoma since the early 1960s. Results of single-agent trials for drugs that are commercially available are presented in Table 2.
Anthracyclines were among the first agents proven to be effective. Doxorubicin has been studied in phase II and III clinical trials at doses of 50–60 mg/m2, yielding overall response rates between 25 and 37 % (see Table 2). Epirubicin produced a similar response rate of 26 % in one small phase II study [40]. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®) proved disappointing in first-line treatment, producing a response rate of only 11.5 % [42]. However, additional data demonstrated RR of 36 % in the first line and 22 % in second line [43, 44]. Moreover, activity in combination with carboplatin is encouraging [26].
Platinum agents also have good activity. Cisplatin and its less neurotoxic analog, carboplatin, have produced response rates between 20 and 42 % in a number of single-agent trials (see Table 2). A trial of oxaliplatin by the GOG in patients with prior platinum therapy reported a response rate of 13.5 % [41]. The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, are the only agents ever shown to have meaningful activity in previously treated patients and have, therefore, now been incorporated into most frontline regimens (see Table 2). The data for agents beyond taxanes, anthracyclines, and platinum is summarized below [15, 32, 34, 35, 51, 52]. The combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine achieved 50 % RR in a population of chemo-naïve patients with recurrent disease [53]. The response rate observed for single-agent chemotherapy is rarely over 20 %. Ixabepilone appeared promising but a subsequent phase III trial did not see any benefit over the control arm (doxorubicin or paclitaxel) [54]. New treatment strategies including further developing the “chemotherapy backbone” are urgently needed for this disease [26] (Table 3).
Carcinosarcomas
Uterine carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed müllerian tumors) have been traditionally classified as a subtype of uterine sarcoma but accumulating molecular evidence has reclassified these tumors as more closely related to carcinomas and frequently it is the carcinoma component that will metastasize.
Response rates for single-agent chemotherapy in carcinosarcomas range from 0 to 10 % for doxorubicin [55, 56], 18 to 42 % for cisplatin [57, 58], 32 % for ifosfamide, and 18 % for paclitaxel [59, 60]. As with endometrial carcinomas, combination chemotherapy regimens have been shown to improve response rates at the expense of added toxicity. GOG 194 randomized women with advanced, recurrent, or persistent carcinosarcoma to treatment with ifosfamide alone or ifosfamide plus cisplatin [61]. The combination regimen produced better response rates (54 % versus 36 %), but there was no significant difference in OS (7.6 months versus 9.4 months, p = 0.071). A subsequent study randomized chemotherapy-naïve women with stage III or IV disease to ifosfamide alone or ifosfamide plus paclitaxel [62]. The combination arm produced a significant improvement in response rate, PFS, and OS (HR 0.69; 95 % CI 0.49–0.97; p = 0.03). In the phase II setting, carboplatin and paclitaxel have demonstrated an RR of 54 % with acceptable toxicity in 55 patients [63]. An ongoing phase III clinical trial is comparing the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel to the standard ifosfamide and paclitaxel in this disease (GOG 261).
New Directions
A greater understanding of cancer biology and major advances in biotechnology in the last decade have led to the development of agents targeted against specific abnormalities in cancers, especially to aberrant growth signal transduction and microenvironment factors. A number of these novel therapeutic agents are currently being investigated in advanced endometrial cancer. Agents of interest include erlotinib (an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor), trastuzumab (an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor), antiangiogenics (bevacizumab, cediranib among others), and mTOR inhibitors (everolimus, temsirolimus, and the novel dual-mTOR inhibitors). PI3K, AKT, and dual-mTOR inhibitors are also under investigation for this disease, some with disappointing results as single agents [64]. Metformin, a widely available oral biguanide, is also being studied in GOG protocol 286 in combination with chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer. In addition to its role in inhibiting gluconeogenesis, metformin is postulated to act as a dual-mTOR inhibitor in endometrial cancer cells. A recently published phase II study of the combination of everolimus and letrozole reports an objective response rate of 32 % in 38 patients who were previously considered incurable, with up to two prior cytotoxic chemotherapies. Nine complete responses were achieved with 15 cycles as the median number of cycles among responders. None of the patients in this promising trial discontinued therapy based on toxicity [65]. There is increasing opportunity to incorporate biologic agents in the treatment of women with advanced endometrial cancer; future directions include implementing small-molecule inhibitors to extend the role of systemic therapies and further improve patient outcomes (Table 4).
Conclusions
-
Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma have a median survival of about a year.
-
Platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy produces response rates between 40 and 60 % in the setting of metastatic endometrial carcinoma.
-
A survival benefit has recently been demonstrated for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III endometrial carcinoma.
-
Uterine carcinosarcomas are aggressive cancers with a 35 % overall 5-year survival. Preliminary data suggest a benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy.
References
Kosary CL. FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina. Semin Surg Oncol. 1994;10:31–46.
Randall ME, Spirtos NM, Dvoretsky P. Whole abdominal radiotherapy versus combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cisplatin in advanced endometrial carcinoma (phase III): Gynecologic Oncology Group Study No. 122. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995;19:13–5.
Maggi R, Lissoni A, Spina F, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy vs radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial carcinoma: results of a randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:266–71.
Susumu N, Sagae S, Udagawa Y, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pelvic radiotherapy versus cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108:226–33.
Hogberg T. Adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:S57–9.
Homesley HD, Filiaci V, Gibbons SK, et al. A randomized phase III trial in advanced endometrial carcinoma of surgery and volume directed radiation followed by cisplatin and doxorubicin with or without paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:543–52.
Galaal K, Al Moundhri M, Bryant A, Lopes AD, Lawrie TA. Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5, CD010681.
Goff BA, Goodman A, Muntz HG, Fuller Jr AF, Nikrui N, Rice LW. Surgical stage IV endometrial carcinoma: a study of 47 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;52:237–40.
Chi DS, Welshinger M, Venkatraman ES, Barakat RR. The role of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;67:56–60.
Bristow RE, Zerbe MJ, Rosenshein NB, Grumbine FC, Montz FJ. Stage IVB endometrial carcinoma: the role of cytoreductive surgery and determinants of survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78:85–91.
Memarzadeh S, Holschneider CH, Bristow RE, et al. FIGO stage III and IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma: impact of residual disease on survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12:454–8.
Lambrou NC, Gomez-Marin O, Mirhashemi R, et al. Optimal surgical cytoreduction in patients with stage III and stage IV endometrial carcinoma: a study of morbidity and survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:653–8.
Thomas MB, Mariani A, Cliby WA, Keeney GL, Podratz KC, Dowdy SC. Role of cytoreduction in stage III and IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:190–3.
Vandenput I, Van Calster B, Capoen A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with serous endometrial cancer with transperitoneal spread (stage IV): a new preferred treatment? Br J Cancer. 2009;101:244–9.
Thigpen JT, Blessing JA, DiSaia PJ, Yordan E, Carson LF, Evers C. A randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1408–14.
Thigpen JT, Brady MF, Homesley HD, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin with or without cisplatin in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3902–8.
Aapro M. Docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have failed alkylating chemotherapy: a preliminary report of the randomized phase III trial. 303 Study Group. Semin Oncol. 1998;25:7–11.
Gallion HH, Brunetto VL, Cibull M, et al. Randomized phase III trial of standard timed doxorubicin plus cisplatin versus circadian timed doxorubicin plus cisplatin in stage III and IV or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3808–13.
Fleming GF, Filiaci VL, Bentley RC, et al. Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin + cisplatin versus doxorubicin + 24-h paclitaxel + filgrastim in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1173–8.
Fleming GF, Brunetto VL, Cella D, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2159–66.
Miller DFV, Fleming G, et al. Randomized phase III noninferiority trial of first line chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;3:771–3.
Hoskins PJ, Swenerton KD, Pike JA, et al. Paclitaxel and carboplatin, alone or with irradiation, in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:4048–53.
Sorbe B, Andersson H, Boman K, Rosenberg P, Kalling M. Treatment of primary advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma with a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel-long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18:803–8.
Scudder SA, Liu PY, Wilczynski SP, et al. Paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine in advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96:610–5.
Arimoto T, Nakagawa S, Yasugi T, et al. Treatment with paclitaxel plus carboplatin, alone or with irradiation, of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:32–5.
Goldfinger M, Diaz I, Muggia F. Systemic treatment of endometrial cancer: what is doxorubicin’s role? J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2181–2.
van Wijk FH, Lhomme C, Bolis G, et al. Phase II study of carboplatin in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. A trial of the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:78–85.
Trope C, Grundsell H, Johnsson JE, Cavallin-Stahl E. A phase II study of Cis-platinum for recurrent corpus cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1980;16:1025–6.
Thigpen JT, Blessing JA, Lagasse LD, DiSaia PJ, Homesley HD. Phase II trial of cisplatin as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Clin Oncol. 1984;7:253–6.
Thigpen JT, Blessing JA, Homesley H, Creasman WT, Sutton G. Phase II trial of cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;33:68–70.
Seski JC, Edwards CL, Herson J, Rutledge FN. Cisplatin chemotherapy for disseminated endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:225–8.
Edmonson JH, Krook JE, Hilton JF, et al. Randomized phase II studies of cisplatin and a combination of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-cisplatin (CAP) in patients with progestin-refractory advanced endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1987;28:20–4.
Deppe G, Cohen CJ, Bruckner HW. Treatment of advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma with cis-dichlorodiamine platinum (II) after intensive prior therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1980;10:51–4.
Horton J, Begg CB, Arseneault J, Bruckner H, Creech R, Hahn RG. Comparison of adriamycin with cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Cancer Treat Rep. 1978;62:159–61.
Pawinski A, Tumolo S, Hoesel G, et al. Cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide in patients with advanced and/or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a randomized phase II study of the EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;86:179–83.
Moore DH, Blessing JA, Dunton C, Buller RE, Reid GC. Dactinomycin in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;75:473–5.
Gunthert AR, Ackermann S, Beckmann MW, et al. Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: AGO Uterus-4. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:86–90.
Katsumata N, Noda K, Nozawa S, et al. Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer: a Japanese Cooperative Study. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:999–1004.
Thigpen JT, Buchsbaum HJ, Mangan C, Blessing JA. Phase II trial of adriamycin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979;63:21–7.
Calero F, Asins-Codoner E, Jimeno J, et al. Epirubicin in advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Grupo Ginecologico Espanol para el Tratamiento Oncologico (GGETO). Eur J Cancer. 1991;27:864–6.
Fracasso PM, Blessing JA, Molpus KL, Adler LM, Sorosky JI, Rose PG. Phase II study of oxaliplatin as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:523–6.
Homesley HD, Blessing JA, Sorosky J, Reid G, Look KY. Phase II trial of liposomal doxorubicin at 40 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;98:294–8.
Balbi G, Visconti S, Monteverde A, Manganaro MA, Cardone A. Liposomal doxorubicin: a phase II trial. Acta Biomed. 2007;78:210–3.
Escobar PF, Markman M, Zanotti K, Webster K, Belinson J. Phase 2 trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in advanced endometrial cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003;129:651–4.
Muggia FM, Blessing JA, Sorosky J, Reid GC. Phase II trial of the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2360–4.
Lissoni A, Zanetta G, Losa G, Gabriele A, Parma G, Mangioni C. Phase II study of paclitaxel as salvage treatment in advanced endometrial cancer. Ann Oncol. 1996;7:861–3.
Woo HL, Swenerton KD, Hoskins PJ. Taxol is active in platinum-resistant endometrial adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 1996;19:290–1.
Lincoln S, Blessing JA, Lee RB, Rocereto TF. Activity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88:277–81.
Hirai Y, Hasumi K, Onose R, et al. Phase II trial of 3-h infusion of paclitaxel in patients with adenocarcinoma of endometrium: Japanese Multicenter Study Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:471–6.
Ball HG, Blessing JA, Lentz SS, Mutch DG. A phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;62:278–81.
Miller DS, Blessing JA, Lentz SS, Waggoner SE. A phase II trial of topotecan in patients with advanced, persistent, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87:247–51.
Wadler S, Levy DE, Lincoln ST, Soori GS, Schink JC, Goldberg G. Topotecan is an active agent in the first-line treatment of metastatic or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3E93. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2110–4.
Brown J, Smith JA, Ramondetta LM, et al. Combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is highly active in women with endometrial carcinoma: results of a prospective phase 2 trial. Cancer. 2010;116:4973–9.
McMeekin S, Dizon D, Barter J, et al. Phase III randomized trial of second-line ixabepilone versus paclitaxel or doxorubicin in women with advanced endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138:18–23.
Gershenson DM, Kavanagh JJ, Copeland LJ, Edwards CL, Freedman RS, Wharton JT. High-dose doxorubicin infusion therapy for disseminated mixed mesodermal sarcoma of the uterus. Cancer. 1987;59:1264–7.
Omura GA, Major FJ, Blessing JA, et al. A randomized study of adriamycin with and without dimethyl triazenoimidazole carboxamide in advanced uterine sarcomas. Cancer. 1983;52:626–32.
Thigpen JT, Kronmal R, Vogel S, et al. A phase II trial of vinblastine in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group Study. Am J Clin Oncol. 1987;10:429–31.
Thigpen JT, Blessing JA, Orr Jr JW, DiSaia PJ. Phase II trial of cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent mixed mesodermal sarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986;70:271–4.
Sutton GP, Blessing JA, Rosenshein N, Photopulos G, DiSaia PJ. Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus (a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:309–12.
Curtin JP, Blessing JA, Soper JT, DeGeest K. Paclitaxel in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83:268–70.
Sutton G, Brunetto VL, Kilgore L, et al. A phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without cisplatin in carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:147–53.
Homesley HD, Filiaci V, Markman M, et al. Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:526–31.
Powell MA, Filiaci VL, Rose PG, et al. Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2727–31.
Matulonis U, Vergote I, Backes F, et al. Phase II study of the PI3K inhibitor pilaralisib (SAR245408; XL147) in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136:246–53.
Slomovitz BM, Jiang Y, Yates MS, et al. Phase II study of everolimus and letrozole in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:930–6.
Slayton RE, Blessing JA, Delgado G. Phase II trial of etoposide in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer Treat Rep. 1982;66:1669–71.
Poplin EA, Liu PY, Delmore JE, et al. Phase II trial of oral etoposide in recurrent or refractory endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74:432–5.
Rose PG, Blessing JA, Lewandowski GS, Creasman WT, Webster KD. A phase II trial of prolonged oral etoposide (VP-16) as second-line therapy for advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63:101–4.
Sutton GP, Blessing JA, DeMars LR, Moore D, Burke TW, Grendys EC. A phase II Gynecologic Oncology Group trial of ifosfamide and mesna in advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63:25–7.
Tait DL, Blessing JA, Hoffman JS, et al. A phase II study of gemcitabine (gemzar, LY188011) in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:118–21.
Sutton GP, Blessing JA, Homesley HD, McGuire WP, Adcock L. Phase II study of ifosfamide and mesna in refractory adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1994;73:1453–5.
Dizon DS, Blessing JA, McMeekin DS, Sharma SK, Disilvestro P, Alvarez RD. Phase II trial of ixabepilone as second-line treatment in advanced endometrial cancer: gynecologic oncology group trial 129-P. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3104–8.
Muss HB, Blessing JA, Hatch KD, Soper JT, Webster KD, Kemp GM. Methotrexate in advanced endometrial carcinoma. A phase II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1990;13:61–3.
Broun GO, Blessing JA, Eddy GL, Adelson MD. A phase II trial of vincristine in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Am J Clin Oncol. 1993;16:18–21.
Jackson Jr DV, Jobson VW, Homesley HD, et al. Vincristine infusion in refractory gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 1986;25:212–6.
Alvarez T, Miller E, Duska L, Oliva E. Molecular profile of grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: is it a type I or type II endometrial carcinoma? Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:753–61.
Oza AM, Eisenhauer EA, Elit L, et al. Phase II study of erlotinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: NCIC IND-148. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4319–25.
Fleming GF, Sill MW, Darcy KM, et al. Phase II trial of trastuzumab in women with advanced or recurrent, HER2-positive endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:15–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Musa, F. (2015). Treatment of Advanced and Recurrent Carcinoma: Chemotherapy. In: Muggia, F., Santin, A.D., Oliva, E. (eds) Uterine Cancer. Current Clinical Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/7631_2015_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7631_2015_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47267-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47269-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)