Abstract
Due to its extraordinary features such as large surface area, high electrical conductivity, chemical stability and mechanical properties, graphene attracts great interest in various fields of biomedical sciences including biosensors, cancer therapy, diagnosis and regenerative medicine. The use of graphene-based materials has been of great interest for the design of scaffolds that can promote neural tissue regeneration. Recent studies published over the last few years clearly show that graphene and graphene based materials promote adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of various cells including embryonic stem cells (ESC), neural stem cells (NSC), mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC). Therefore graphene based materials are one of the promising nanoplatforms in regenerative medicine for neural tissue injury. With its unique topographic and chemical properties, graphene is used as a scaffold that could provide a bridge between regenerating nerves. More importantly, as a conductive substrate, graphene allows the continuation of electrical conduction between damaged nerve ends. The integration of supportive cells such as glial, neural precursor or stem cells in such a scaffold shows higher regeneration when compared to currently used neural autografts and nerve conduits. This review discusses the details of such studies involving graphene based materials with a special interest on neural stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells or pluripotent stem cells.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The mammalian brain is an extraordinary organic machine that has fascinated scientists and clinicians for hundreds of years. A complex network of chemical and biochemical components of more than a dozen million neurons leads to the emergence of thought, emotion, memory and life. In contrast, fine imbalances or damage to this system can cause serious complications in physical, motor, psychological, and cognitive functions. Furthermore, the loss of inevitable nerve tissue due to degenerative diseases and traumatic injuries is destructive due to the limited regenerative ability of the central nervous system (Shah et al. 2016).
Currently, there are nanotechnology-based approaches developed to direct neural differentiation and regeneration. Among these approaches, stem cell based regenerative medicine shows the greatest hope for repairing and regenerating damaged nerve tissue. However, the establishment of controlled and reliable methodologies (eg, neurons and oligodendrocytes) that direct stem cell differentiation to specialized cells has been a major problem in the field.
2 Graphene and Its Properties
Graphene is a two-dimensional crystal formed by sp2 hybridization of carbon atoms arranged in the form of a honeycomb and composed of single atomic layers of graphite (Bitounis et al. 2013; de Lázaro et al. 2014; Novoselov 2011). Even though the existence of single grafic plates is theoretically debated (Slonczewski and Weiss 1958), the presence of two-dimensional atomically fine crystalline materials was considered physically impossible (Venables et al. 1984). For the first time in 2004, Novoselov and Geim isolated and characterized a single graphene layer by ‘Scotch Tape’ method (Novoselov et al. 2004). Novoselov and Geim were awarded the Nobel Prize in 2010 for their discovery of this new carbon allotrope (Geim 2011; Novoselov 2011). The simple planar arrangement of the carbon atoms within the single layer of graphene and the covalent bonding between these carbon atoms give graphene unique properties (Fig. 1).
The generation of novel or improved graphene based biomaterials has had a major impact on nanotechnology. Due to its two-dimensional structure, high surface area, high electrical conductivity, chemical stability and bendable properties, graphene attracts great interest in various fields of biomedical sciences including biosensors, cancer therapy, diagnosis and regenerative medicine (Okan et al. 2016; Saner et al. 2010). All these features provide the ability to immobilize many substances such as metals, drugs, biomolecules, fluorescent probes and cells on graphene surface (Reina et al. 2014).
The application of graphene based materials in cell biology and physiology allows targeted interactions at the basic molecular level. In neuroscience, for example, it requires specific interactions with neurons, glial cells or other neuronal cells. Exemplary investigations include development of advanced molecular imaging technologies, engineering hybrid materials used in neural regeneration and developing technologies designed for targeted delivery of drugs and small molecules to blood-brain barrier and neuroprotection (Silva 2006).
2.1 Biocompatibility of Graphene Based Materials
Numerous studies have been conducted to improve the use of graphene in the biomedical field and to understand the toxicity profile in preclinical studies. By engineering surface chemistry, colloidal properties, water solubility and size, graphene-based biomaterials can become more biocompatible (Bussy et al. 2013). The toxicity profile of graphene based materials has been studied extensively in both in vitro and in vivo systems and there are promising results suggesting that these materials will be able to translated into clinical settings in the future (Seabra et al. 2014). In vitro studies have shown that when oxidised (referred to as graphene oxide- GO), or surface functionalized (with biodegradable polymers), toxicity related to graphene could be abolished (Ali-Boucetta et al. 2013). Supporting cell culture studies, animal models have also shown that graphene-based materials which are small and single layer or conjugated to polymers such as PEG can be eliminated from living systems (Bussy et al. 2013). Therefore, considering such studies, it is possible to produce biocompatible biomaterials which will not cause toxicity.
3 The Nervous System
The nervous system is a network of signals that allows the brain and other parts of the body to function simultaneously. Neurons are electrically excitable cells which are using a concentration gradient of various ions (sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride etc.) and provide electrical conduction through the release neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine. Since neurons do not have division capabilities (suspended in G0 phase), it is of great importance to establish new treatment options for neural diseases by using the ability of stem cells to differentiate into neuronal cells (Fraczek-Szczypta 2014; Shin et al. 2016).
Glial cells are the most abundant cell type in the nervous system. Virchow first explained that there were cells present in neural tissue other than neurons. The first characterization of glial cells is a result of microscopic studies and metallic impregnation techniques developed by Ramon y Cajal and Rio Hortega in particular. Using gold impregnation, astrocytes; a few years later, oligodendrocytes and microglia, using silver carbonate impregnation were named (del Río-Hortega 1921, 1928).
Figure 2 summarizes the different types of cells present in CNS and PNS (Amoh et al. 2005; Frostick et al. 1998; Gardin et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2000; Nedergaard 1994; Ramírez-Jarquín et al. 2014; Scholz and Woolf 2007; Sedaghati et al. 2011; Spassky et al. 2005; Zhou et al. 2010)
The most common injuries affecting the nervous system are peripheral nerve injuries (CNS), spinal cord injury (SCI), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Gardin et al. 2016). The incidence of peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is estimated to be between 13 and 23 per 100,000 people per year in developed countries and causes partial or complete loss of motor, sensory and autonomic function in the relevant segments of the body. On the other hand, spinal cord injuries with an incidence of 750 out of every 1,000,000 people in the world are seriously threatening life (Wyndaele and Wyndaele 2006).
Most of the peripheral nerve injuries are repaired using nerve autografts, but they are limited to the source of donor nerves and may cause morbidity of the donor site (Zhou et al. 2010). Typically, axons in the micro perimeter of the peripheral nerve (PN) may be self-regulating at a relatively short distance (not greater than 5 mm). Regeneration of PN begins with the separation of Schwann cells (SCs) from axons, occurs as a result of incision of myelin sheaths and is phagocytozed by glial cells. SCs that break from the axons can multiply and enhance axonal guidance (Terenghi 1999). On the other hand, the cell loss during spianl cord injury can not be replaced by the body itself, and thus the spinal cord function is permanently lost. Due to the limited internal regenerative abilities, experts from different fields are encouraged to seek new ways to regenerate damaged or diseased nervous system, such as many pharmacological approaches, stem cell treatments, delivery of neurotrophic factors and biomaterial use (Lee-Kubli and Lu 2015).
4 Graphene in Regenerative Medicine
Ding and colleagues stated that a Web of Science search for “graphene” and “tissue engineering” showed that the majority of studies with graphene-based materials were based on bone and neural tissue regeneration (Ding et al. 2015). This trend clearly demonstrates the global importance of the graphene and the increase in interest of scientists in this field. In short, novel biomaterial platforms that can be used in regenerative medicine.
As confirmed by the increase in the number of publications, it is not surprising that the graphene has shown great interest in nanomedicine and biomedical applications. Recent studies published over the last few years clearly show that graphene and graphene based materials promote adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of various cells such as embryonic stem cells (ESC), neural stem cells (NSC), mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) and thus graphene based materials are known to be one of the promising nanoplatforms in regenerative medicine (Bressan et al. 2014).
Currently, there are various preclinical applications of graphene-based biomaterials showing bone tissues regeneration (Lee et al. 2011; Nayak et al. 2011), partial repair of muscle mass and loss of function (Kenry et al. 2018), usage in cardiac therapies (Park et al. 2014), regeneration of adipose tissue (Gomillion and Burg 2006). Due to the complexity of the anatomy and physiology of the nervous system compared to the other tissues, the repair and regeneration of injured and malfunctioning neural tissue via graphene based materials still need to be investigated further (Fraczek-Szczypta 2014).
5 Graphene, Neurons and Glia Cells
Recently, the use of graphene-based materials has been of great interest for the design of scaffolds that can promote neuron regeneration. With its unique topographic and chemical properties, graphene is a promising scaffold that could provide a bridge between regenerating nerves. More importantly, as a conductive substrate, graphene allow the continuation of electrical conduction between damaged nerve ends. The integration of supportive cells such as glial and neural precursor cells in such a scaffold can enhanec regeneration when compared to currently used neural autografts and nerve conduits.
Differentiation of stem cells to neurons or neuronal cells for neural regeneration is a critical step while developing stem cell based therapies. Several types of graphene scaffolds have been studied which supported significant stem cell differentiation.
Park et al. used a graphene scaffold as an inducer to differentiate human neural stem cells (NSCs) into neurons (Park et al. 2011). Wang et al. showed that human MCS underwent more neuronal differentiation on fluorine-functional graphene sheets compared to pristine graphene material (Wang et al. 2012). Selective differentiation of stem cells to neurons or oligodendrocytes for regeneration of central nervous system is a highly preferred situation and Shah et al. showed that even in the absence of growth factors, NSCs can differentiate into oligodendrocytes by using only GO-coated cell culture surfaces (Shah et al. 2014).
One of the greatest advantages of using graphene in nerve tissue damage, which also makes it more preferred than other conventional biomaterials, is the ability to create functional neural network connectivity. For, example, when embryonic neural progenitor cells were cultured on three dimentional GO-layers, it was observed that there were not only neurons and glial cells differentiated on these layers, but also a neural network rich in dendrites, axons and synaptic connections (Serrano et al. 2014).
6 Graphene and Neural Tissue Injuries
Currently, there is no cure for spinal cord injury (SCI), however, various scientific studies have recently begun to investigate the potential use of stem cells for SCI. In these cases, stem cell therapies focus on the introduction of neurons and oligodendroglia cells at the injury site in order to create a good microenvironment for the regenerating cells (Salewski et al. 2010). In this regard, mesenchymal stem cells, Schwan cells, glia cells and neurons from olfactory mucosa, neural stem cell and progenitor cells and embryonic stem cells have been used (Schroeder et al. 2016).
In spinal cord injury, there are two potential approaches in which stem cells are used: transplantation of stem cells into the injury site or use of nerural precursor cells at the damaged spinal cord. Transplantation of stem cells is a risky task and requires a precise surgical procedure, and there is a possiblity that the immune system may reject new cells (in cases of embryonic and neural stem cell use). The enhancement of the treatment potential with the help of biomaterials such as graphene has been suggested in various studies. According to these, when graphene-based materials are applied together with stem cells or neural precursor cell, they induce the differentiation towards neurons, oligodendroglia and astrocytes (Barnabé-Heider and Frisén 2008; Nayak et al. 2011; Park et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012).
In addition to the two dimentional stem cell culture system, there are studies involving three dimentional graphene based materials which better mimic the in vivo microenvironment. Li et al. has shown that they can achieve proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells using a 3D graphene scaffold (Li et al. 2013; Nayak et al. 2011). In another study, 3D graphene oxide scaffolds were tested in spinal cord injury-induced rats, and an increase in tissue repair was observed (López-Dolado et al. 2015). However, in this study even though no local or systemic toxicity was observed, the use of diisocyanate-containing cross-linkers which was involved during the long-term production processes graphene, increases the toxicity risks of this application. In addition, the researchers have only investigated one type of graphene and the effects of different surface chemistry and derivatives with topography have not been investigated and the mechanism of tissue repair has not been explained.
7 Graphene and Stem Cells
With the purpose of neural tissue regeneration, graphene based materials have been tested with various cell sources and mostly with neural stem/progenitor cells and other stem cells including mesenchymal, embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells. Various graphene based materials have been combined not only with polymers or differentiation factors but also under electrical or magnetic field. This review will discuss the details of studies performed with neural stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells or pluripotent stem cells.
7.1 Neural Stem Cells
Neural stem cells are multipotent in origin and they are present in the adult central nervous system. They can renew themselves and give rise to new neurons and supporting neuronal cells. Activation of NSCs or their transplantation into areas of central nervous system injury can lead to regeneration in animal models (Barkho and Zhao 2011). Various graphene based materials and hybrid systems have been studied with neural stem cells (Table 1). In 2011, Park et al. generated laminin coated graphene substrates and following NSC seeding, authors observed enhanced neural differentiation (Park et al. 2011). Laminin coatings have been combined with graphene based materials in various studies. It has been suggested that it improves cell seeding and survival on the biomaterial substrates. In addition to extracellular proteins such as laminin, researchers have included differentiation factors such as b-FGF, EGF, PDGF or NGF to improve the differentiation protocol (Park et al. 2011; Solanki et al. 2013).
In hybrid systems, graphene has been combined with nanofibers or other nanoparticles. For examples, graphene and Silica based nanoparticle hybrid structures successfully aligned axons, the differentiation and growth of adult hNSCs (Solanki et al. 2013). In another study, titanium oxide combined reduced GO (rGO) substrates were produced and their flash photo stimulation resulted in a ∼ 23-fold increase in the neural to glial cell ratio (Akhavan and Ghaderi 2013).
Another study used GO sheets coated with PCL nanofibers which were generated by electrospinning. When NSCs were seeded on these hybrid srufaces oligodendrocyte differentiation was improved (Shah et al. 2014). Weaver et al. showed that GO-poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanocomposite films can also induce oligondendrocyte differentiation (Weaver and Cui 2015). In another microfiber study, nanostructured rGO poly-D-lysine microfibers were demonstrated to be more successful in adhesion and proliferation of NSCs than 2D graphene film and tissue culture plate (Guo et al. 2017).
In addition to the above reports with 2-dimentional (2D) graphene based materials, there are also studies performed in 3-dimention (3D). One of the first studies showed that, in the presence of FGF-2 and EGF, 3D graphene foams improved the proliferation of NSC and enhanced their differentiation towards astrocytes and especially neurons (Li et al. 2013). In another comparison study between 2D and 3D graphene based materials, Song et al. suggested that 3D graphene causes less neuroinflammation in microglia than 2D graphene (Song et al. 2014). Furthermore, monophasic electrical stimulation was also shown to enhance NPCs neurogenesis on 3D graphene scaffolds (Nguyen et al. 2018). Recently, 3D printing technologies have been also combined with graphene based substrates and Huang et al. reported that 3D printed graphene–polyurethane composite hydrogel enhanced the oxygen metabolism and neural differentiation of NSC (Huang et al. 2017).
7.2 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) which are having multipotent differentiation potential, can be obtained from bone marrow or fat tissue. MSCs are currently being investigated preclinically for the treatment of various diseases and are being tested in clinical trials (Ullah et al. 2015). Similar to NSCs, MSCs have been also investigated with different graphene based materials in order to test their efficacies for neural tissue regeneration (Table 2). When GO was combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix, human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs) showed differentiation to ectodermal cells, especially neurons in the presence of differentiation factors (Kim et al. 2015b). On the other hand, there were studies which reported enhanced differentiation even in the presence of such factors. For examples, cell alignment using printed PDMS channel arrays on fluorinated graphene enhanced the neuro-induction of hMSCs in the absence of growth or differentiation factors (Wang et al. 2012).
Similar to NSC studies, 3D printing was also combined with MSCs. In 2015, when MSCs were incubated on 3D printed graphene polylactide-co-glycolide scaffolds, in vitro studies showed neurogenic differentiation with significant upregulation of glial and neuronal genes in the absence of differentiation factors. In vivo studies suggested that 3D printed scaffolds showed promising biocompatibility over the course of at least 30 days (Jakus et al. 2015). In another recent study, 1 step- and 2- step growth graphene were shown to be effective at neuronal differentiation of bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells (Lee et al. 2018)
Electrical stimulation also improves the MSCs differenation on graphene based substrates. For examples, Lee et al. reported that extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields exposure synergistically increased biological efficacy of neuronal differentiation of hMSCs grown on graphene-coated substrates (Lee et al. 2015). Later, in 2016, electric pulses generated by the triboelectric nanogenerator were shown to induce neural differentiation of MSCs when cells were grown on rGO- Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) hybrid microfibers (Guo et al. 2016b).
7.3 Pluripotent Stem Cells
Pluripotent stem cells are classified in two categories, embryonic and induced pluripotent. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are derived from the inner cell mass of a blastocyst whereas induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are generated from somatic cells following forced expression of reprogramming factors (Chin et al. 2009; Takahashi and Yamanaka 2006; Thomson et al. 1998). In one of the first studies involving graphene and pluripotent stem cells (Table 3), mouse iPSCs were cultured on both graphene or GO surfaces spontaneously differentiated into ectodermal and mesodermal lineages, and authors reported that these materials could be a promising strategy to use in differentiation protocols in pluripotent stem cell cultures (Chen et al. 2012). Later in 2012, when mouse embryonic stem cells were seeded on graphene or graphene oxide surfaces under stromal cell-derived inducing activity, only GO effectively promoted mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation towards dopamine neurons compared to only graphene treated cells or negative control groups (Yang et al. 2014). In a recent study, transgenic mouse embryos were used to derive substantia nigra dopaminergic cells which were then cultured on graphene flakes containing nanocrystalline glass-like carbon films. The results demonstrated neuronal capability and there was a direct relationship between the thickness of the films and cell maturation (Rodriguez-Losada et al. 2017).
8 Conclusion an Future Perspectives
Graphene has a tremendous interface and a very conductive path for the conduction of electricity (Chen et al. 2011). Neurons in this count are electro-active and electrical stimulation can affect the behavior of stem cells (Chang et al. 2011; Ghasemi-Mobarakeh et al. 2011). For this reason, graphene has been used in various neural tissue regeneration studies which are summarized in Fig. 3. With the development of graphene derivatives, more specific needs for injury repair can be met. Most of the studies have examined the differentiation potential of Schwann cells, oligondendrocytes or neurons, however more detailed experiments are needed to understand the effect of graphene based materials on differentiation of other glial cells such as astrocytes, microglia or ependymal cells, since a healthy microenvironment would be needed for efficient neural tissue repair.
In addition to the development of novel graphene derivatives, 3D printing technologies are getting improved. As seen from the above Tables, there are already reports in literature which involves printing of graphene with additional polymers and growth factors. Most of the time, following the production of these 3D printed scaffolds, cells are seeded on their surface to evaluate differentiation potential. With the help of advanced bioprinting technologies, researchers will be able to print cells and materials together which can anatomically and histologically mimic the healthy neural tissue.
Abbreviations
- 2D:
-
Two dimentional
- 3D:
-
Three dimentional
- 1 step-G:
-
One-step growth
- 2 step-G:
-
Two-step growth
- BDNF:
-
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
- b-FGF:
-
Basic fibroblast growth factor
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- Cu:
-
Copper
- ECM:
-
Extracellular matrix
- EGF:
-
Epidermal growth factor
- ELF-EMF:
-
Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields
- ESCs:
-
Embryonic stem cells
- FGF-2:
-
Fibroblast growth factor 2
- G:
-
Graphene
- GO:
-
Graphene oxide
- hADMSCs:
-
Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells
- hMSCs:
-
Human mesenchymal stem cells
- hNPCs:
-
Human neural progenitor cells
- hNSCs:
-
Human neural stem cells
- IFNγ:
-
Interferon-γ
- iPSCs:
-
Induced pluripotent stem cells
- LIF:
-
Leukemia inhibitory factor
- LPS:
-
Lipopolysaccharide
- MSCs:
-
Mesenchymal stem cells
- NGLC:
-
Nanocrystalline glass-like carbon film
- NGF:
-
Nerve growth factor
- NGO:
-
Nanosized graphene oxide
- NPCs:
-
Neural progenitor cells
- NSCs:
-
Neural stem cells
- PADM:
-
Porcine acellular dermal matrix
- PCL:
-
Polycaprolactone
- PDGF:
-
Platelet-derived growth factor
- PDMS:
-
Polydimethylsiloxane
- PEDOT:
-
Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)
- PEG:
-
Poly (ethylene glycol)
- PN:
-
Peripheral nerve
- PNI:
-
Peripheral nerve injury
- PNS:
-
Peripheral nervous system
- PU:
-
Polyurethane
- rGO:
-
Reduced graphene oxide
- SCI:
-
Spinal cord injury
- SCs:
-
Schwann cells
- SDIA:
-
Stromal cell-derived inducing activity
- siNPs:
-
Silica nanoparticles
- TBI:
-
Traumatic brain injury
- TCPS:
-
Tissue culture polystyrene
- TiO2 :
-
Titanium dioxide
References
Akhavan O, Ghaderi E (2013) Flash photo stimulation of human neural stem cells on graphene/TiO 2 heterojunction for differentiation into neurons. Nanoscale 5:10316–10326
Ali-Boucetta H, Bitounis D, Raveendran-Nair R, Servant A, Van den Bossche J, Kostarelos K (2013) Purified graphene oxide dispersions lack in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo pathogenicity. Adv Healthc Mater 2:433–441
Amoh Y, Li L, Campillo R, Kawahara K, Katsuoka K, Penman S, Hoffman RM (2005) Implanted hair follicle stem cells form Schwann cells that support repair of severed peripheral nerves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:17734–17738
Barnabé-Heider F, Frisén J (2008) Stem cells for spinal cord repair. Cell Stem Cell 3:16–24
Bitounis D, Ali-Boucetta H, Hong BH, Min DH, Kostarelos K (2013) Prospects and challenges of graphene in biomedical applications. Adv Mater 25:2258–2268
Bressan E, Ferroni L, Gardin C, Sbricoli L, Gobbato L, Ludovichetti FS, Tocco I, Carraro A, Piattelli A, Zavan B (2014) Graphene based scaffolds effects on stem cells commitment. J Transl Med 12:296
Bussy C, Ali-Boucetta H, Kostarelos K (2013) Safety considerations for graphene: lessons learnt from carbon nanotubes. Acc Chem Res 46:692–701
Chang K-A, Kim JW, a Kim J, Lee S, Kim S, Suh WH, Kim H-S, Kwon S, Kim SJ, Suh Y-H (2011) Biphasic electrical currents stimulation promotes both proliferation and differentiation of fetal neural stem cells. PLoS One 6:e18738
Chen G-Y, Pang D-P, Hwang S-M, Tuan H-Y, Hu Y-C (2012) A graphene-based platform for induced pluripotent stem cells culture and differentiation. Biomaterials 33:418–427
Chen Z, Ren W, Gao L, Liu B, Pei S, Cheng H-M (2011) Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat Mater 10:424
Chin MH, Mason MJ, Xie W, Volinia S, Singer M, Peterson C, Ambartsumyan G, Aimiuwu O, Richter L, Zhang J (2009) Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell Stem Cell 5:111–123
de Lázaro I, Yilmazer A, Kostarelos K (2014) Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells: a new source for cell-based therapeutics? J Control Release 185:37–44
del Río-Hortega P (1921) Estudios sobre la neurogia. La glia de escasas rediaciones (oligodendroglia). Bol Real Soc Esp Hist Nat 21:63–92
del Río-Hortega P (1928) Tercera aportación al conocimiento morfológico e interpretación funcional de la oligodendroglıá. Mem Real Soc Esp Hist Nat 14:5–122
Ding X, Liu H, Fan Y (2015) Graphene-based materials in regenerative medicine. Adv Healthc Mater 4:1451–1468
Fraczek-Szczypta A (2014) Carbon nanomaterials for nerve tissue stimulation and regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 34:35–49
Frostick SP, Yin Q, Kemp GJ (1998) Schwann cells, neurotrophic factors, and peripheral nerve regeneration. Microsurgery 18:397–405
Gardin C, Piattelli A, Zavan B (2016) Graphene in regenerative medicine: focus on stem cells and neuronal differentiation. Trends Biotechnol 34:435–437
Geim AK (2011) Nobel lecture: random walk to graphene. Rev Mod Phys 83:851
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Baharvand H, Kiani S, Al-Deyab SS, Ramakrishna S (2011) Application of conductive polymers, scaffolds and electrical stimulation for nerve tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 5:e17
Gomillion CT, Burg KJ (2006) Stem cells and adipose tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:6052–6063
Guo W, Qiu J, Liu J, Liu H (2017) Graphene microfiber as a scaffold for regulation of neural stem cells differentiation. Sci Rep 7:5678
Guo W, Wang S, Yu X, Qiu J, Li J, Tang W, Li Z, Mou X, Liu H, Wang Z (2016a) Construction of a 3D rGO–collagen hybrid scaffold for enhancement of the neural differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Nanoscale 8:1897–1904
Guo W, Zhang X, Yu X, Wang S, Qiu J, Tang W, Li L, Liu H, Wang ZL (2016b) Self-powered electrical stimulation for enhancing neural differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on graphene–poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) hybrid microfibers. ACS Nano 10:5086–5095
Huang C-T, Shrestha LK, Ariga K, Hsu S-h (2017) A graphene–polyurethane composite hydrogel as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting and differentiation of neural stem cells. J Mater Chem B 5:8854–8864
Jakus AE, Secor EB, Rutz AL, Jordan SW, Hersam MC, Shah RN (2015) Three-dimensional printing of high-content graphene scaffolds for electronic and biomedical applications. ACS Nano 9:4636–4648
Kenry LWC, Loh KP, Lim CT (2018) When stem cells meet graphene: opportunities and challenges in regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 155:236–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.004
Kim J, Park S, Kim YJ, Jeon CS, Lim KT, Seonwoo H, Cho S-P, Chung TD, Choung P-H, Choung Y-H (2015a) Monolayer graphene-directed growth and neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Nanotechnol 11:2024–2033
Kim T-H, Shah S, Yang L, Yin PT, Hossain MK, Conley B, Choi J-W, Lee K-B (2015b) Controlling differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells using combinatorial graphene hybrid-pattern arrays. ACS Nano 9:3780–3790
Lee-Kubli CA, Lu P (2015) Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cell therapies for spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res 10:10
Lee WC, Lim CHY, Shi H, Tang LA, Wang Y, Lim CT, Loh KP (2011) Origin of enhanced stem cell growth and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano 5:7334–7341
Lee Y-J, Jang W, Im H, Sung J-S (2015) Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields enhance neuronal differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on graphene-based substrates. Curr Appl Phys 15:S95–S102
Lee YJ, Seo TH, Lee S, Jang W, Kim MJ, Sung JS (2018) Neuronal differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in response to the domain size of graphene substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 106:43–51
Li N, Zhang Q, Gao S, Song Q, Huang R, Wang L, Liu L, Dai J, Tang M, Cheng G (2013) Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep 3:1604
Liu S, Qu Y, Stewart TJ, Howard MJ, Chakrabortty S, Holekamp TF, McDonald JW (2000) Embryonic stem cells differentiate into oligodendrocytes and myelinate in culture and after spinal cord transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:6126–6131
López-Dolado E, González-Mayorga A, Portolés MT, Feito MJ, Ferrer ML, del Monte F, Gutiérrez MC, Serrano MC (2015) Subacute tissue response to 3D graphene oxide scaffolds implanted in the injured rat spinal cord. Adv Healthc Mater 4:1861–1868
Nayak TR, Andersen H, Makam VS, Khaw C, Bae S, Xu X, Ee P-LR, Ahn J-H, Hong BH, Pastorin G (2011) Graphene for controlled and accelerated osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Nano 5:4670–4678
Nedergaard M (1994) Direct signaling from astrocytes to neurons in cultures of mammalian brain cells. Science 263:1768–1771
Nguyen AT, Mattiassi S, Loeblein M, Chin E, Ma D, Coquet P, Viasnoff V, Teo EHT, Goh EL, Yim EK (2018) Human Rett-derived neuronal progenitor cells in 3D graphene scaffold as an in vitro platform to study the effect of electrical stimulation on neuronal differentiation. Biomed Mater 13:034111
Novoselov KS (2011) Graphene: materials in the flatland (Nobel Lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed 50:6986–7002
Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669
Okan BS, Marset A, Seyyed Monfared Zanjani J, Sut PA, Sen O, Çulha M, Menceloglu Y (2016) Thermally exfoliated graphene oxide reinforced fluorinated pentablock poly (l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) electrospun scaffolds: insight into antimicrobial activity and biodegradation. J Appl Polym Sci 133(22):43490
Park J, Park S, Ryu S, Bhang SH, Kim J, Yoon JK, Park YH, Cho SP, Lee S, Hong BH (2014) Graphene–regulated Cardiomyogenic differentiation process of mesenchymal stem cells by enhancing the expression of extracellular matrix proteins and cell signaling molecules. Adv Healthc Mater 3:176–181
Park SY, Park J, Sim SH, Sung MG, Kim KS, Hong BH, Hong S (2011) Enhanced differentiation of human neural stem cells into neurons on graphene. Adv Mater 23:H263
Ramírez-Jarquín UN, Lazo-Gomez R, Tovar-y-Romo LB, Tapia R (2014) Spinal inhibitory circuits and their role in motor neuron degeneration. Neuropharmacology 82:101–107
Reina G, Tamburri E, Orlanducci S, Gay S, Matassa R, Guglielmotti V, Lavecchia T, Letizia Terranova M, Rossi M (2014) Nanocarbon surfaces for biomedicine. Biomatter 4:e28537
Rodriguez-Losada N, Romero P, Estivill-Torrús G, de Villoria RG, Aguirre JA (2017) Cell survival and differentiation with nanocrystalline glass-like carbon using substantia nigra dopaminergic cells derived from transgenic mouse embryos. PLoS One 12:e0173978
Salewski RP, Eftekharpour E, Fehlings MG (2010) Are induced pluripotent stem cells the future of cell-based regenerative therapies for spinal cord injury. J Cell Physiol 222:515–521
Saner B, Okyay F, Yürüm Y (2010) Utilization of multiple graphene layers in fuel cells. 1. An improved technique for the exfoliation of graphene-based nanosheets from graphite. Fuel 89:1903–1910
Scholz J, Woolf CJ (2007) The neuropathic pain triad: neurons, immune cells and glia. Nat Neurosci 10:1361
Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR (2016) The use of cell transplantation in spinal cord injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:266–275
Seabra AB, Paula AJ, de Lima R, Alves OL, Duran N (2014) Nanotoxicity of graphene and graphene oxide. Chem Res Toxicol 27:159–168
Sedaghati T, Yang SY, Mosahebi A, Alavijeh MS, Seifalian AM (2011) Nerve regeneration with aid of nanotechnology and cellular engineering. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 58:288–300
Serrano M, Patiño J, García-Rama C, Ferrer M, Fierro J, Tamayo A, Collazos-Castro J, Del Monte F, Gutierrez M (2014) 3D free-standing porous scaffolds made of graphene oxide as substrates for neural cell growth. J Mater Chem B 2:5698–5706
Shah S, Solanki A, Lee KB (2016) Nanotechnology-based approaches for guiding neural regeneration. Acc Chem Res 49:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00345
Shah S, Yin PT, Uehara TM, Chueng STD, Yang L, Lee KB (2014) Guiding stem cell differentiation into oligodendrocytes using graphene-nanofiber hybrid scaffolds. Adv Mater 26:3673–3680
Shin SR, Li YC, Jang HL, Khoshakhlagh P, Akbari M, Nasajpour A, Zhang YS, Tamayol A, Khademhosseini A (2016) Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 105:255–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.007
Silva GA (2006) Neuroscience nanotechnology: progress, opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:65
Slonczewski J, Weiss P (1958) Band structure of graphite. Phys Rev 109:272
Solanki A, Chueng STD, Yin PT, Kappera R, Chhowalla M, Lee KB (2013) Axonal alignment and enhanced neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells on graphene-nanoparticle hybrid structures. Adv Mater 25:5477–5482
Song Q, Jiang Z, Li N, Liu P, Liu L, Tang M, Cheng G (2014) Anti-inflammatory effects of three-dimensional graphene foams cultured with microglial cells. Biomaterials 35:6930–6940
Spassky N, Merkle FT, Flames N, Tramontin AD, García-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A (2005) Adult ependymal cells are postmitotic and are derived from radial glial cells during embryogenesis. J Neurosci 25:10–18
Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676
Terenghi G (1999) Peripheral nerve regeneration and neurotrophic factors. J Anat 194:1–14
Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282:1145–1147
Ullah I, Subbarao RB, Rho GJ (2015) Human mesenchymal stem cells-current trends and future prospective. Biosci Rep 35:e00191
Venables J, Spiller G, Hanbucken M (1984) Nucleation and growth of thin films. Rep Prog Phys 47:399
Wang Y, Lee WC, Manga KK, Ang PK, Lu J, Liu YP, Lim CT, Loh KP (2012) Fluorinated graphene for promoting neuro-induction of stem cells. Adv Mater 24:4285–4290
Weaver CL, Cui XT (2015) Directed neural stem cell differentiation with a functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite. Adv Healthc Mater 4:1408–1416
Wyndaele M, Wyndaele J-J (2006) Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord 44:523
Yang D, Li T, Xu M, Gao F, Yang J, Yang Z, Le W (2014) Graphene oxide promotes the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells to dopamine neurons. Nanomedicine 9:2445–2455
Barkho BZ, Zhao X (2011) Adult neural stem cells: response to stroke injury and potential for therapeutic applications. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 6:327–338
Zhou K, Nisbet D, Thouas G, Bernard C, Forsythe J (2010) Bio-nanotechnology approaches to neural tissue engineering. In: Tissue engineering. InTech, Rijeka
Acknowledgement
AY, HT and CG acknowledge support by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey and FlagEra Graphene Project G-IMMUNOMICS (TUBITAK, grant number 315S202).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aydin, T., Gurcan, C., Taheri, H., Yilmazer, A. (2018). Graphene Based Materials in Neural Tissue Regeneration. In: Turksen, K. (eds) Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 3. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology(), vol 1107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2018_221
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2018_221
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04184-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04185-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)