Abstract
Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a serious complication after cardiac surgery. Risk factors include patient-related conditions (obesity, female sex, age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, carriage of Staphylococcus aureus on the skin) and surgical aspects (paramedian sternotomy, re-exploration for bleeding, prolonged ventilation). Patients receiving bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafts have better long-term outcomes but also a higher risk of sternal wound complications, as consequence of a complete sternal devascularization. This problem may be prevented by skeletonization of BITA grafts. Other useful precautions are presurgical bathing with chlorhexidine, as well as the identification and prevention of all preoperative and perioperative risk factors, including surgical techniques, rapid extubation, and early removal of catheters. Surgical treatment for DSWI includes many different techniques, depending on wound degree and institutional policy.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a serious and potentially devastating complication after cardiac surgery that is associated with longer hospital stays, repeat surgical procedures, and mortality [1, 2]. In the infectious disease literature for all types of surgery, three categories of surgical site infection are defined: type 1, corresponding to superficial incisional; type 2, deep incisional (muscle and fascia); and type 3, deep organ space (bone and/or mediastinum) [3]. The most common definition is that of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) including at least one of the following criteria:
-
1.
An organism is isolated from mediastinal tissue or fluid obtained during the surgical procedure or needle aspiration.
-
2.
Evidence of mediastinitis seen during surgery or by histopathological examination.
-
3.
At least one of the following: fever (>38°), chest pain, or sternal instability, associated with either purulent discharge from the mediastinal area or organism cultured from blood or mediastinal widening on X-ray [3,4,5,6].
Despite many advances in prevention, DSWI remains significant, with an incidence ranging between 0.5 and 6.8% [7, 8]. Numerous studies have identified patient-related and procedure-related factors that may contribute to the occurrence of DSWI. Patient factors include obesity, female sex, age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes or hyperglycemia during the perioperative period, tobacco smoking, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, kidney dysfunction, recent treatment with antibiotics, skin infection anywhere on the body, and emergency or urgent surgery [5, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The high incidence of DSWI in obese patients can be explained by the poor perfusion of subcutaneous adipose layers with low levels of prophylactic antibiotics in this tissue. In fact, Filsoufi showed that obesity was associated with a more than twofold increase in the risk of DSWI [7]. Patients with diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia are also at increased risk of infection. The reason for the increased risk of DSWI in these patients is that hyperglycemia causes the formation of advanced glycation end products, which can affect host cell function by impairing humoral response, complement activation, chemotaxis, adhesions, and phagocytosis [17, 18]. In a large prospective study, Brown demonstrated that hyperglycemia was an independent risk factor for death, length of hospital stay, and infection rate [19]. Moreover, in a recent study, Gatti [20] reported the importance of HbA1c screening in all patients undergoing cardiac surgery because unrecognized diabetes and poor glycemic control may have immediate and long-term prognostic implications in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Patient carriage of Staphylococcus aureus on the skin and in the nostrils has been identified as an important risk factor for DSWI [21]. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guidelines recommend routine nasal administration of 5-d mupirocin 2% for all patients undergoing cardiac surgery procedures in the absence of documented negative testing for staphylococcal colonization [22]. Surgical risk factors include inadvertent paramedian sternotomy [23], repeat exploration for bleeding [24], use of bone wax, extensive use of electrocauterization [13], prolonged duration of aortic cross clamp or cardiopulmonary bypass [11], postoperative bleeding [25], blood transfusions [7, 12, 26], prolonged mechanical ventilation [4, 7], and finally the use of both internal mammary arteries [4, 13, 27].
2 Why BITA?
In coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, the conventional strategy has been to utilize the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) for grafting to the left anterior descending artery and the radial artery or saphenous vein to bypass other coronary arteries [28]. The use of LITA grafts has been associated with improved survival at 10 years and reduced incidence of myocardial infarction, cardiac events, and reoperation compared with the use of vein graft alone [29, 30]. Prompted by this evidence, surgeons have attempted to use a bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) graft, which should further improve the long-term outcomes of coronary revascularization. Despite the increasing evidence that patients who receive BITA grafts have better long-term outcomes than those receiving single ITA grafts [31, 32], until now, BITA grafting has not been widely adopted. Indeed, BITA grafting is performed in only 4 and 12% of all CABG patients in North America and Europe, respectively [33]. The most salient, persistent, and serious objection to BITA grafting has been an increased risk of sternal wound complications [34, 35].
3 Pathophysiology
In coronary artery bypass grafting, it is clear from experimental and clinical evidence that the increased risk of wound complications appears to be an effect of sternal ischemia caused by the harvest of ITA [36]. Anatomic studies have reported that the harvesting of a single ITA causes significant devascularization of the ipsilateral hemisternum; thus bilateral ITA dissection brings on sternal wound complications [34, 35].
Arnold et al. [37] observed that sternal circulation depends only on a periosteal plexus that arises from segmental sternal branches of the ITA. When one ITA is mobilized, revascularization of that side of the sternum may be possible by crossover collaterals from the unharvested side with intact blood supply. Obviously, a tight sternal closure is necessary to ensure optimal and stable contact between the two sternal sides. According to the same study, complete sternal devascularization occurs with bilateral ITA harvesting. Seyfer [38] demonstrated no evidence for collateral flow to the sternum that could immediately substitute the missing ITA, with a 90% decrease in sternal blood flow after mobilization of one ITA. Moreover, inadequate blood flow impairs local immune response and reduces effectiveness of antibiotics when contamination occurs. These findings could explain the higher rate of sternal wound after BITA grafting.
4 Prevention
In most centers ITA is harvested as a pedicle, together with the vein, muscle, fat, and accompanying endothoracic fascia. The electrocautery that is used for harvesting damages the blood supply to the sternum, and this impairs sternal healing and exposes the sternum to the risk of infection. The anatomic study by Henriquez-Pino et al. [39] showed that some of the 4–6 sternal branches of the ITA and some intercostal branches may arise from the ITA as a common trunk. If that common trunk can be preserved during ITA dissection, then sternal collateralization may be improved. In a study using technetium-99m methylene diphosphate bone scanning and single-photon emission computed tomography, Cohen et al. showed that a pedicled left internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending artery reduces blood flow to the left side of the sternum during the acute postoperative period. This does not occur when the left internal thoracic artery is skeletonized [36]. This technique for ITA mobilization is associated with a low rate of deep sternal infection, probably associated with less devascularization of the sternum [40]. However, ITA skeletonization is not a universal remedy to avoid sternal complication, but contributes strongly, together with other preventive preoperative and intraoperative measures for avoiding wound problems. First of all, preoperative prevention is of paramount prevention; perioperative intranasal mupirocin is recommended for all cardiac surgery procedures to decrease sternal complications [41, 42], presurgical bathing with chlorhexidine is useful in reducing bacterial count [43], and preoperative identification of untreated diabetes and optimization of glycemic control is strongly recommended [20, 44]. Intraoperatively, meticulous wound opening and closing technique is mandatory. Bone wax should not be used [43], and tight sternal closure with a figure-of-eight technique or using the Robicsek weave technique may prevent sternum instability and infection [45, 46]. Lastly, in order to decrease the risk of wound infections, it is important to avoid bleeding complications that can require repeat surgery [47]. Rapid extubation and early removal of indwelling central venous and urinary catheters may contribute to avoiding complications [48, 49].
Conclusions
To conclude, it is clear that the problem of DSWI is multifactorial, and it is difficult to anticipate exactly which risks factors and triggering events may cause infection. The best results will be achieved through constant engagement and rigorous discipline of all the healthcare professionals in contact with the patient (anesthetist, surgeon, nurse) from the beginning of hospitalization to discharge. Regarding surgical treatment, there are many options for sternal wound closure depending on the degree of the wound and institutional policy. These include closed suction antibiotic catheter irrigation systems, bilateral pectoralis major muscle flap, omental transposition, the latissimus dorsi muscle flap, vacuum-assisted closure, and various combinations of the above [50].
References
Lepelletier D, Poupelin L, Corvec S, Bourigault C, Bizouarn P, Blanloeil Y, Reynaud A, Duveau D, Despins P (2009) Risk factors for mortality in patients with mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 102:119–125
Toumpoulis IK, Anagnostopoulos CE, Derose JJ Jr, Swistel DG (2005) The impact of deep sternal wound infection on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 127:464–471
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:247–280
Ridderstolpe L, Gill H, Granfeldt H, Ahifeldt H, Rutberg H (2001) Superficial and deep sternal wound complications: incidence, risk factors and mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:1168–1175
Sakamoto H, Fukuda I, Oosaka M, Nakata H (2003) Risk factors and treatment of deep sternal wound infection after cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 9(4):226–232
Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA (2008) CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specifics types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 36:309–332
Filsoufi F, Castillo JG, Rahmanian PB, Broumand SR, Silvay G, Carpentier A, Adams DH (2009) Epidemiology of deep sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23:488–494
Kanafani ZA, Arduino JM, Muhlbaier LH, Kaye KS, Allen KB, Carmeli Y, Corey GR, Cosgrove SE, Fraser TG, Harris AD, Karchmer AW, Lautenbach E, Rupp ME, Peterson ED, Straus WL, Fowler VG (2009) Incidence of and preoperative risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and chest wound infection after cardiac surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30(3):242–248
Dodds Ashley ES, Carroll DN, Engemann JJ, Harris AD, Fowler VG, Sexton DJ, Kaye KS (2004) Risk factors for postoperative mediastinitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 38:1555–1560
Harrington G, Russo P, Spelman D, Borrell S, Watson K, Barr W, Martin R, Edmonds D, Cocks J, Greenbough J, Lowe J, Randle L, Castell J, Browne E, Bellis K, Aberline M (2004) Surgical-site infection rates and risk factor analysis in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 25:472–476
Berrios-Torres SI, Mu Y, Edwards JR, Horan TC, Fridkin SK (2012) Improved risk adjustment in public reporting: coronary artery bypass surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33:463–469
Lepelletier D, Perron S, Bizouarn P, Caillon J, Drugeon H, Michaud JL, Duveau D (2005) Surgical-site infection after cardiac surgery: incidence, microbiology, and risk factors. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26:466–472
Robinson PJ, Billah B, Leder K, Reid CM, ASCTS Database Committee (2007) Factors associated with deep sternal wound infection and hemorrhage following cardiac surgery in Victoria. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6:167–171
Risnes I, Abdelnoor M, Almdahl SM, Svennevig JL (2010) Mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass grafting : risk factors and long-term survival. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1502–1509
Gardlund B (2007) Postoperative surgical site infections in cardiac surgery; an overview of preventive measures. APMIS 115:989–995
Cayci C, Russo M, Cheema FH, Martens T, Ozcan V, Argenziano M, Oz MC, Ascherman J (2008) Risk analysis of deep sternal wound infections and their impact on long-term survival: a propensity analysis. Ann Plast Surg 61:294–301
Gan YH (2013) Host susceptibility factors to bacterial infections in type2 diabetes. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003794
Casqueiro J, Alves C (2012) Infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. A review of pathogenesis. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 16(Suppl 1):S27–S36
Brown JR, Edwards FH, O’Connor GT, Ross CS, Furnary AP (2006) The diabetic disadvantage: historical outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery; the pre-intravenous insulin era. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 18:281–288
Gatti G, Perrotti A, Reichart D, Maschietto L, Onorati F, Chocron S, Dalén M, Svenarud P, Faggian G, Santarpino G, Fischlein T, Pappalardo A et al (2017) Glycated hemoglobin and risk of sternal wound infection after isolated coronary surgery. Circ J 81:36–43
von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G (2001) Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Study group. N Engl J Med 344:11–16
Engelman R, Shahian D, Shemin R, Guy TS, Bratzler D, Edwards F, Jacobs M, Fernando H, Bridges C (2007) Workforce on Evidence Based Medicine, Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guidelines series: antibiotics prophylaxis in cardiac surgery, part II: antibiotic choice. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1569–1576
Zeitani J, Penta de Peppo A, Moscarelli M, Guerrieri Wolf L, Scafuri A, Nardi P, Nanni F, Di Marzio E, De Vico P, Chiariello L (2006) Influence of sternal size and inadvertent paramedian sternotomy on stability of the closure site: a clinical and mechanical study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:38–42
Junoz P, Menasalvas A, Bernaldo de Quiros JC, Desco M, Vallejo JL, Bouza E (1997) Postsurgical mediastinitis: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 25:1060–1064
Bryan CS, Yarbrough WM (2013) Preventing deep wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: a review. Tex Heart Inst J 40:125–139
Banbury MK, Brizzio ME, Rajeswaran J, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH (2006) Transfusions increases the risk of postoperative infections after cardiovascular surgery. J Am Coll Surg 202:131–138
Diez C, Kock D, Kuss O, Silber RE, Friedrich I, Boergermann J (2007) Risk factors for mediastinitis after cardiac surgery – a retrospective analysis of 1700 patients. J Cardiothorac Surg 28:655–660
Aldea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J et al (2016) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 101:801–809
Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC et al (1986) Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-years survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 314:1–6
Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV (1996) Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery graft: effects on survival over a 15-years period. N Engl J Med 334:216–219
Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, Houghtaling PL, Arnold JH, Akhrass R et al (1999) Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:855–872
Buxton BF, Komeda M, Fuller JA, Gordon I (1998) Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery: risk-adjusted survival. Circulation 98(19 Suppl):III-1–III-6
Tabata M, Grab JD, Khalpey Z, Edwards FH, O’Brien SM, Cohn LH, Bolman RM 3rd (2009) Prevalence and variability of internal mammary artery graft use in contemporary multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Circulation 120:935–940
Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Mahfood S, McHenry MC, Goormastic M, Stewart RW, Golding LA, Taylor PC (1990) J. Maxwell Chamberlain memorial paper. Sternal wound complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: early and late mortality, morbidity, and cost of care. Ann Thorac Surg 49:179–187
Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Gerry S, Benedetto U, Flather M, Investigators ART (2016) Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts. N Engl J Med 375(26):2540–2549
Cohen AJ, Lockman J, Loberboym M, Bder O, Cohen N, Medalion B, Schachner A (1999) Assessment of sternal vascularity with single photon emission computed tomography after harvesting of the internal thoracic artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:496–502
Arnold M (1972) The surgical anatomy of sternal blood supply. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 64:596–610
Seyfer AE, Shriver CD, Miller TR, Graeber GM (1988) Sternal blood flow after sternotomy and mobilization of internal mammary arteries. Surgery 104:899–904
Henriquez-Pino JA, Gomes WJ, Prates JC, Buffolo E (1997) Surgical anatomy of the internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 64:1041–1045
Pevni D, Mohr R, Lev-Run O, Locer C, Paz Y, Kramer A, Shapira I (2003) Influence of bilateral skeletonized harvesting on occurrence of deep sternal wound infection in 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Ann Surg 237:277–280
Cimochowski GE, Harostock MD, Brown R, Bernardi M, Alonzo N, Coyle K (2001) Intranasal mupirocin effectively reduces sternal wound infections after open heart surgery in diabetics and nondiabetics. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1572–1579
Bode LGM, Kloytmans JA, Werthiem HF, Bogaers D, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Roosendaal R, Troelstra A, Box AT, Voss A, van der Tweel I, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, Vos MC (2010) Preventing surgical-site infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 362:9–17
Lazar HL, Salm TV, Engelman R, Orgill D, Gordon S (2016) Prevention and management of sternal wound infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152:962–972
Halkos ME, Puskas JD, Lattouf OM, Kilgo P, Kerendi F, Song HK, Guyton RA, Thourani VH (2008) Elevated preoperative hemoglobin A1c level is predictive of adverse events after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:631–640
Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Vida V, Casarotto D, Gerosa G (2003) Double crisscross sternal wiring and chest wound infections : a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:1352–1356
Robicsek F, Daugherty HK, Cook JW (1977) The prevention and treatment of sternum separation following open heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 73:267–275
Boeken V, Eisner J, Feindt P, Petzold TH, Schulte HD, Game E (2001) Does the time of resternotomy for bleeding have any influence on the incidence of sternal infections, septic courses or further complications? J. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49:45–48
Graf K, Sohr D, Haverich A, Kuhn C, Gastmeier P, Chaberny IF (2009) Decrease of deep sternal surgical site infections rates after cardiac surgery by a comprehensive infection control program. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9:282–286
LeGuillou V, Tavolacci MP, Baste JM, Hubscher C, Bedost E, Bessou JP, Litzler PY (2011) Surgical site infection after central venous catheter-related infection in cardiac surgery. Analysis of a cohort of 7557 patients. J Hosp Infect 79:236–241
Singh K, Anderson E, Garrett Harper J (2011) Overview and management of sternal wound infection. Semin Plast Surg 25(1):25–33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perrotti, A., Gatti, G., Ecarnot, F., Chocron, S. (2018). Deep Sternal Infection Following Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting. In: Shiffman, M., Low, M. (eds) Vascular Surgery, Neurosurgery, Lower Extremity Ulcers, Antimicrobials, Wound Assessment, Care, Measurement and Repair. Recent Clinical Techniques, Results, and Research in Wounds, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2018_127
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2018_127
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10715-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10716-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)