Abstract
Nanocellulose has been used with promising results as reinforcement material in composites, many of which include hydrophobic polymers. However, the hydrophilic nature of nanocellulose can be better exploited in composites that incorporate high surface energy systems as well as in applications that can benefit from such properties. In fact, proteins can be ideal components in these cases. This paper reviews such aspects, which are based on the remarkable mechanical properties of nanocellulose. This material also exhibits low density, high aspect ratio, high surface area, and can be modified by substitution of its abundant hydroxyl groups. It also shows biocompatibility, low toxicity, and biodegradability. Convenient biotechnological methods for its production are of interest not only because of the possible reduction in processing energy but also because of positive environmental aspects. Thus, enzymatic treatments are favorable for effecting fiber deconstruction into nanocellulose. In addition to reviewing nanocellulose production by enzymatic routes, we discuss incorporation of enzyme activity to produce biodegradable systems for biomedical applications and food packaging. Related applications have distinctive features that take advantage of protein–cellulose interactions and the possibility of changing nanocellulose properties via enzymatic or protein treatments.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Bacterial cellulose (BC)
- Biocompatibility
- Cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)
- Cellulose nanofibril (CNF)
- Enzyme
- Immobilization
- Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)
- Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)
- Protein
1 Enzymatic Production of Nanocellulose
The production of nanocellulose through mechanical treatments requires high energy consumption [1], therefore a combination of different treatments has been suggested. One strategy to reduce the energy needed during these processes involves the use of different types of enzymes to improve accessibility and cellulose hydration and swelling. Also, reduction of the degree of polymerization of cellulose in fibers has been attempted by using cellulolytic enzymes. Specifically, endoglucanase enzymes are of interest because they preferentially attack the less crystalline regions within the fiber cell walls and cause their swelling and softening [2]. There are several studies highlighting the advantage of using enzymatic treatments for nanocellulose production (Table 1). In some cases, a reduction in yield as a result of cellulose loss is an important issue, for example, as reported in the case of fungal treatments [13].
An environmentally friendly method was developed by Henriksson et al. [3], who obtained microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) or nanofibers from bleached fibers after enzymatic hydrolysis with endoglucanases, followed by mechanical refining. The main advantage of this treatment compared with acid hydrolysis is the high aspect ratio of the nanofibers obtained after disintegration as a result of a decrease in the degree of polymerization of cellulose and an increase in swelling caused by endoglucanase action. These results were confirmed by another study that used a combination of high pressure shear forces and mild enzymatic hydrolysis to prepare MFC [4]. The material that resulted from using only mechanical shearing was not homogenous, in part because of blockages within the system. In contrast, when enzymatic hydrolysis steps were used between mechanical refining stages, the MFC obtained displayed a more uniform and smaller characteristic width and a high aspect ratio. This effect was mainly ascribed to cell wall delamination promoted by enzymatic action. The resulting material had higher elastic modulus than the material obtained using acid hydrolysis. Another interesting finding was the more entangled network formed by cellulose fibrils obtained enzymatically compared with those obtained by acid hydrolysis, which showed little or no entanglement. Siqueira and coworkers [12] took advantage of the combination of enzymatic hydrolysis followed by a mechanical shearing to produce nanocomposite films with good thermomechanical properties. A comparative study between commercial endo- and exoglucanases was performed earlier by same authors [11]. The enzymes were responsible for a much higher reduction in the degree of polymerization because they attacked specific sites on the chain and released small moieties in the form of nanoparticles, the morphology of which depended on the treatment used.
Fungi such as Trichoderma reseei have been used to prepare cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) from cotton [5], which was prepared by a conventional method employing hydrochloric acid. After controlled enzymatic hydrolysis, the slurry was subjected to additional fermentation stages to obtain CNC. It was found that the fungus consumed significant amounts of MCC for its own growth, as expected from the fact that cellulose was the only carbon source available for the microorganisms. In contrast to materials obtained after acid hydrolysis, fungal treatment produce no significant changes in surface chemistry. In fact, enzymatic or fungal methods do not install negatively charged groups on the surface (e.g., sulfate half ester groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis) and result in material with negative zeta potential, less than −15 mV, making the material suitable for biomedical and related applications.
An integrated production of both cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and bioethanol was developed by Zhu and coworkers [10]. The cellulosic material presented a decreased degree of polymerization after enzymatic hydrolysis, as found by other researchers, which facilitated the production of CNF by subsequent mechanical methods (microfluidization). The fiber length was significantly affected by cellulases, as observed in Fig. 1. The opacity and mechanical properties of nanopapers made from CNFs were better than those obtained from eucalyptus fibers. Moreover, and as a side advantage, the residual sugar stream was fermented by typical microorganisms to produce bioethanol with an efficiency of 92%.
Recently, Satyamurthy and Vigneshwaran [7] produced spherically shaped nanocellulose particles by using MCC subjected to degradation by an anaerobic microbial consortium of Clostridium sp. and coccobacillus. The nanocellulose obtained preserved its structure without any chemical modification, which makes it suitable for applications that demand minimum chemical changes to cellulose, such as biomedical, drug delivery and other applications requiring biocompatibility.
A major drawback of most methods for producing nanocellulose materials is the characteristic low yield. Satyamurthy and coworkers prepared CNC with a yield of 22% [5], whereas the same group reported a maximum yield of ~12% using an anaerobic microbial consortium [7]. In contrast, Filson et al. [6] studied the enzymatic hydrolysis of recycled paper using endoglucanases, following by microwave or conventional heating to produce related materials. The presence of nanocrystals was confirmed by flow birefrigerence and it was demonstrated that the heating method gave a higher yield (~38%) than conventional methods giving typical yields of ~ 29%. The authors highlighted the stability of the obtained crystals as nanofillers for reinforced polymer composites. They attributed the high negative zeta potential to the long-term stability of aqueous dispersions of CNC.
Although the production of nanocellulose from lignocellulosic materials has been heavily studied, other sources of cellulose could be useful. An exoglucanase (CBH I) was applied to produce shortened MCC from algal cellulose of Cladophora sp. [8]. These short elements exhibited high crystallinity because the cellulose allomorph Iα was preferentially degraded by the enzymes, leaving the highly ordered crystalline Iβ domains unaffected. As an application, the authors indicated that the short elements could act as nano-ordered bioparticles.
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a promising source for producing CNC. George et al. [9] prepared CNC from Acetobacter xylinum using cellulases from Trichoderma reseei. The amorphous domains were removed, whereas the crystalline portion was unaltered, in part because of better stability of this nanomaterial compared with material obtained by acid hydrolysis. Moreover, nanocomposites were produced using poly(vinyl alcohol) matrices. It was found that, even at low loading of CNC from BC (1 wt%), the mechanical and thermal stability was favorably affected.
Having discussed several prominent methods for producing CNF, MFC, and CNC, the following sections evaluate the functionality and application of these biobased nanomaterials. Not only does nanocellulose possess outstanding thermal and mechanical properties, it is also naturally biocompatible, which gives it tremendous potential in biomedical applications. Considered together, the mechanical properties, malleable nature, and biocompatibility render CNF, MFC, and CNC exceptional candidates in related fields.
2 Nanocellulose, Proteins, and Enzymes: Interactions and Immobilization
Nanocellulose is suitable for immobilization of different proteins. An inexpensive, simple, and direct immobilization method is desirable so that the nanocellulose can display its promising features [14]. Immobilization can be carried out by different mechanisms, involving covalent or noncovalent attachment, biochemical affinity, and physical adsorption (van de Waals forces, hydrogen bonds, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions).
The immobilization of enzymes onto a material can help to increase their thermal and pH stability and provide relative longevity and reusability [15]. This could also allow substrates to be modified for biosensors, industrial applications, and continuous catalytic processes [15–17], as discussed in the next sections.
Ong et al. [14] demonstrated as early as 1989 that cellulosic materials offer a strong and stable noncovalent binding capacity for the carbohydrate binding domains (CBD) of certain cellulase enzymes, simplifying their immobilization onto the substrate. This technique was shown to extend enzyme activity (although decreased to 42% by immobilization) and helped to stabilize it against thermal and pH fluctuations [14]. Since the undertakings of Ong et al. [14], other successful studies utilizing covalent attachment have also been conducted [15, 18, 19]. Arola et al. [15] used CNF to covalently immobilize two types of proteins (alkaline phosphatase and anti-hydrocortisone antibody). Specialized techniques were utilized to conjugate the proteins to three CNF-derived substrates based on their prominent functional groups (epoxy, amine, and carboxylic acid) [15]. The study concluded that hydrophilic substrates can support immobilization better than their hydrophobic counterparts, and that certain kinds of covalent immobilization have a distinct advantage over nonspecific adsorption of proteins. Using this covalent approach, Mahmoud and coworkers [18] were able to attach an enzyme to a CNC matrix conjugated with gold particles. In this system, the specific enzyme activity and stability were improved [18]. Incani et al. [19] have similarly produced materials for use in biosensor applications by covalently immobilizing glucose oxidases (GOx) to CNC that had been previously modified with gold nanoparticles (AuNP), with their deposition being controlled using cationic polyethylenimine (PEI) at various pH levels [19] (see Fig. 2).
Adsorption interaction has been studied on cellulose-based aerogels with promising results [20–23]. The immobilized proteins tended to show increased thermal stability, probably as a result of noncovalent interactions. As a consequence, storage stability was improved [22]. Drug delivery based on nanocellulose has been studied [24]. The relative size of the drugs compared with the porous nature of CNF substrates was crucial, and electrostatic forces were found to be a primary mechanism of interaction. Such interactions were studied in the case of soybean protein adsorption on cellulose [25]. The storage proteins in soybean, glycinin, and β-conglycinin were found to interact with cellulose surfaces by different mechanisms (see Fig. 3). For instance, the adsorption of glycinin increased with ionic strength but β-conglycinin adsorption was reduced. In addition, changes in pH and the use of a reducing agent (2-mercaptoethanol) were found to significantly reduce the adsorption of both proteins. For instance, 2-mercaptoethanol, a reducing agent of the disulfide bonds in proteins, unfolds the protein to expose their hydrophobic groups. The results highlight the fact that protein–cellulose interactions can be tuned by considering the protein structure and its response to physicochemical changes in the surrounding environment.
3 Nanocellulose–Protein Hybrids in 3D Structures: Gels/Hydrogels and Fibers
CNF surface modification via electrostatic interaction, adsorption, bioconjugation, or enzymatic catalysis can increase the versatility of CNF applications and result in increased material benefits. Examples of this include the production of bioinert or biospecific surfaces [26], cell adhesion on scaffolding [27], immobilization of proteins and enzymes for increased stability [14, 15, 19, 22], or production of novel nanocomposites for thin films, aerogels, and fibers.
Interactions between proteins and nanocellulose have been exploited in the development of hydrogels, which can also serve as template material for the preparation of aerogels (e.g., for drug encapsulation). One approach included coating of drug nanoparticles with hydrophobic proteins and embedding them in hydrogels that were subsequently freeze-dried into aerogels [28].
Although CNF is biocompatible, aerogels produced for cell scaffolding tend to have a relatively low affinity for cell attachment and require some protein-based modification to enhance this feature [27]. For instance, fibronectin and collagen type I were conjugated onto the surface of BC using 1-cyano-4-dimethylaminopyridinium (CDAP) as crosslinking agent. This approach enhanced the adhesion and growth of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and mouse mesenchymal stem cell line C3H10T1/2 on bacterial nanocellulose [27].
CNF hydrogels can serve as three-dimensional (3D) cell culture scaffolds for the growth of human hepatic cells (HepaRG and HepG2). The approach included culturing the cells on the hydrogels. Evaluation of injectability of CNF hydrogels indicated that they can flow, even through very small needles, without damaging the cells. In addition, cell viability on CNF hydrogels was similar to that using conventional cell cultures, although cell growth was different for each type of cell studied. For example, HepG2 exhibited nonexponential growth and HepaRG showed less proliferation. Both cell types showed 3D multicellular spheroids (see Fig. 4) [29]. More recently, Lou et al. [30] used CNF hydrogels to create a 3D environment for proliferation and differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). This new flexible culture system was able to maintain the pluripotency of hPSCs for up to 26 days, demonstrating that it could be a useful approach for research and regenerative medicine.
In related efforts, the ability of BC for cartilage regeneration was evaluated. Bovine cartilage samples were punched and BC inserted inside the cartilage cavity, followed by immersion in culture media for 8 weeks. The results indicated that cartilage cells still exhibited vital morphology after that period, with growth of chondrocytes on the surface of BC but not inside the pores. The chondrocytes at the nanocellulose surface showed successful re-differentiation [31].
BC nanofiber 3D networks, with pore sizes between 150 and 500 μm, were prepared by culturing Gluconacetobacter xylinus on medium containing paraffin beads that helped to create a uniform porous structure. These 3D networks served as scaffolds for culture of human nasal and auricular chondrocyte cells and produced cartilaginous matrix protein for cartilage tissue engineering applications [32].
A different approach used unidirectional and 3D laser perforation with a CO2 laser system to produce uniform, round-shaped pores (pore size ~220 μm) on never-dried BC hydrogels. The method included production of rectangular 3D porous structures that were used to grow bovine (24 h) and human (7–21 days) chondrocytes. The results indicated colonization of the BC nanofiber surface and of the laser-perforated channels with vital cells, with both unidirectional and 3D perforated channels, and allowed the re-differentiation of chondrocytes (see Fig. 5). The mechanical properties of the hydrogels were not significantly different from those of nonperforated hydrogels [33].
CNF hydrogels were used to culture HepaRG liver progenitor cells, which induced formation of 3D multicellular spheroids structures. Compared with hyaluronan gelatin hydrogels, the CNF hydrogels proved to be more effective for cell growth of undifferentiated cells and for maintaining differentiation of cells [34]. Likewise, BC hydrogels with high protein loads were prepared using a vortexing method, which took less time (10 min, uptake capacity of 8.4 ± 0.1%) than the adsorption method (24 h, uptake capacity of 7.9 ± 0.7%). The hydrogels produced by the faster method exhibited a denser fiber network morphology, slower protein release, and lower water holding capacity than conventional BC hydrogels [35].
Composites of BC with fish gelatin were prepared by immersing alkali-treated-BC pellicles in gelatin solutions and crosslinking the gels with different chemical agents (transglutaminase, genipin, and 1-ethyl-3-(3-imethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride, EDC). The results indicated an enhancement of the gel elastic behavior with increased protein content. In addition, the morphology of the composites indicated the formation of a dense porous network with gelatin covering the nanocellulose fiber network; after crosslinking, the gelatin improved the rehydration capacity of the material [36].
Widely available and inexpensive proteins from soy bean have been utilized to produce hydrogels and, subsequently, aerogels. For instance, soy protein isolate with a high protein content was used to prepare CNF–soy protein aerogels. The results indicated good synergy between the proteins and nanocellulose in the porous aerogels, which displayed mechanical properties comparable to those of aerogels obtained from pure nanocellulose. In addition, because of the hydrophilic nature of cellulose, these materials showed enhanced water absorption and, interestingly, similar absorption of nonpolar fluids [37]. Similarly, biocomposite porous scaffolds of ovalbumin/poly(vinyl alcohol) reinforced with CNC were prepared recently [38]. The addition of CNC as reinforcement increased the strength and flexibility of the porous scaffolds. The changes were explained by the different morphology of the aerogels obtained after addition of nanocrystals.
In addition to hydrogels, nanocellulose/protein composite fibers have been developed. CNC was used to reinforce prolamin protein (hordein/zein) electrospun nanofibers. The addition of cationically modified (using phenyltrimethylammonium chloride) CNC helped to increase the tensile strength, Young’s modulus, water resistance, and alignment of the fibers. In addition, these fibers were encapsulated with a model drug (riboflavin) and were found to be effective for controlled release within a period of 24 h [39].
The potential of BC for selective biofiltration of blood proteins has been explored [40] by growing and modifying BC (from Gluconacetobacter medellinensis) in the presence of CMC. Such CMC-modified BC was used to synthesize tubules of given sizes. Synthesis was carried out using a silicon tube template through which air was supplied for bacterial growth. Also, 2,2,6,6,-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidation was used to produce TEMPO-oxidized BC tubes. The CMC-modified BC tubes exhibited thicker walls than tubes of pure BC or TEMPO-oxidized BC (see Fig. 6). In addition, CMC not only reduced the irreversible structural changes in BC that occur upon drying but also facilitated the immobilization of anti-human serum albumin (anti-HSA) Affibodies via EDC-NHS conjugation. Interestingly, the CMC-modified BC carrying anti-HSA had better affinity for HSA than TEMPO-oxidized BC.
4 Biocompatible CNF/Polymer Systems
Nonspecific protein adsorption begins instantly after introduction of intracorporeal implants, marking the implant as a foreign or invasive entity needing to be destroyed or isolated [26, 41]. In either event, the effectiveness of the implant is obstructed by layers of protein or a fibrous avascular capsule growth that completely isolate it from the rest of the tissue [26]. Therefore, it is of extreme interest in the field of bionics to develop materials that are biocompatible. “Biocompatibility” can be described as the property of a material that provides an explicit purpose within an organism while, or by, suppressing or expressing all, most, or specifically few natural immunological or foreign body reactions by the organism [26]. Figure 7 illustrates a simplified model of immunoresponsive protein marking on bio-incompatible surfaces through adsorption and denaturation, and how polymer-coated surfaces can intervene in this interaction by making the surface more biocompatible [26]. The prevention of nonspecific protein adsorption is the key factor for biocompatibility of a material [26]. The surface characteristics responsible for preventing protein adsorption, referred to as “Whitesides rules,” involve both the presence of polar and H-bond acceptor groups as well as the absence of net charge or H-bond donor groups [26]. This rule applies to cellulosic materials given their extreme hydration properties, which roughly compensate for the presence of H-bond acceptors in the form of hydroxyl groups [26].
In practice, CNF has been shown to be biocompatible [42–45]. Helenius et al. [46] demonstrated that subcutaneous implants of BC nanofibrils developed very little, if any, inflammation (both acute and chronic) and induced no foreign body responses, such as capsule formation or fibrosis [46]. CNF has been used in cell growth scaffolding for surrogate carotid arteries [42], tissue engineered blood vessels [44], cartilage [43], and burn tissue regeneration [45], to give a few examples.
Table 2 shows techniques that have been used for protein and enzyme immobilization on various cellulose–polymer matrices. Kuzmenko et al. [27] showed that cell adhesion to CNF scaffolds can be increased through bioconjugation of fibronectin and collagen proteins to its surface; these proteins are responsible for cell interactions [48]. This technique modifies CNF surfaces by adhering the cell binding domains of these proteins to the hydroxyl groups extending from the polysaccharides [27]. Crosslinking to produce an intermediate radical, followed by a nucleophilic substitution reaction with the protein amine groups, resulted in a stable, covalently bound protein. This, in turn, improved cell culture binding to the scaffolding, a crucial aspect for healthy tissue development [27]. Others have developed similar methods for different tissues, as each tissue type requires specific proteins for proper tissue adhesion and development [48–50].
Protein adsorption has been studied on nanocellulose-based aerogels, and promising results for biomedical applications have been obtained [20, 22, 23]. Anirudhan and Rejeena [22] immobilized pancreatic serine protease trypsin (TRY) on a composite nanocellulose-based aerogel matrix through adsorption, resulting in increased thermal stability of the protein [22]. Storage shelf-life of the material was also improved by protein immobilization [22]. TRY is a protease enzyme used industrially for various applications and is notoriously unstable, making the enhancement of thermal and storage stabilities perspicuous advantages in the biomedical and food industries [22].
CNF has been investigated for the immobilization of proteins and subsequent film formation. In one study, nanofibers were first functionalized using different chemistries (amination, epoxydation, and TEMPO oxidation) then, alkaline phosphatase (AP) was conjugated in solution to each of the modified CNF, followed by spin-coating of these solutions onto silicon surfaces. Multiple layers of spin-coating gave an increased amount of AP-conjugated CNF on the surface, as revealed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging, which supports the hypothesis of higher enzyme immobilization. The results also indicated an increased stability of the AP-conjugated CNF at temperatures of 21°C and 37°C within a period of 168 h, which indicated biocompatibility for proteins [15].
The development of paper-based biosensors has been investigated. Orelma et al. [16] used TEMPO-oxidized CNFs, activated by EDC/NHS treatment, to conjugate antibodies and proteins. The adsorption of a human blood protein (human immunoglobulin G, hIgG) and bovine serum albumin was tested, demonstrating the use of this surface for the detection and diagnosis of biomolecules. Similarly, Zhang et al. [17] immobilized acetylated HWRGWVA peptide onto bioactive cellulose nanofibrils using the copolymer poly(2-aminoethyl methacrylate hydrochloride-co-2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) as spacer and support layer. This modified-CNF network exhibited a high specific binding capacity for hIgG and high nonspecific protein resistance.
5 Enzymatic Modification of CNF
The natural hydrophilicity and ability of CNF to hydrogen bond into agglomerates makes it difficult to evenly disperse them amid nonpolar polymers in composites without some previous surface modification [51]. One technique uses TEMPO-mediated oxidation to increase the electronegative charge of CNF through the addition of anionic carboxylate groups [51]. Although TEMPO and its derivatives work as catalysts, they are continually reoxidized by primary oxidants, such as NaBr/NaClO or NaClO/NaClO2 reagents in alkali conditions [52]. Oxidative enzymes have shown promise in replacing these primary oxidants while simultaneously maintaining milder reaction conditions. TEMPO-mediated oxidation using laccase enzymes with high oxidation rates was studied for the benefits of milder conditions and potential economic and ecological soundness [52, 53]. It was discovered that when using laccases as the primary oxidant, the percentage of aldehydes produced during oxidation increased between three- and fivefold compared with the chemical system. There were insignificant changes to the nanofibrillar structures, which could prove useful for various composites [52]. The investigation also revealed that site-specific surface modification produced a unique nanocellulose-derived product that could be of use in a number of novel nanocomposites [52]. Application of enzymatic modification of TEMPO-oxidized materials was investigated by Li et al. [54], who prepared nanocomposites through polymerization of phenol enzymatically in the presence of TEMPO-oxidized CNF. Polyphenols formed globular clusters on the nanocellulose, which improved the thermal stability and toughness of the composites and decreased their solubility in organic solvents [54].
Other work utilizing laccases has also been conducted. Garcia-Ubasart et al. [55] showed that the hydrophobicity of nanofibrillated cellulose can be controlled through laccase-mediated coupling of different short, hydrophobic chains to its surface. The coupling reaction, catalyzed by laccase, showed that hydrophobization could be maximized by coupling dodecyl 3,4,5- trihydroxybenzoate (HB-C12) with flax fiber-based nanofibrillated cellulose [55]. The resulting water contact angles of the fiber webs were found to be 80–96° degrees, significantly greater than those of the control [55]. Cusola et al. [56] also manipulated surface hydrophobicity through applying a novel, multicomponent colloidal system comprised of laccase, hydrophobic dodecyl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate (LG), and dispersant (sulfonated lignin) to couple LG onto the surface of CNF. It was observed that the low surface energy of LG was imparted to the composite and that the surface roughness greatly diminished, as shown by a 90° increase in water contact angle and AFM imaging on spin-coated thin films, respectively [56]. These reports concluded that laccase is capable of modifying the surface of cellulose-derived materials through the coupling of hydrophobic materials.
6 Final Remarks
The production of nanocellulose materials from lignocelluloses or other sources is still at the developmental and demonstration scale. According to the discussion presented here and literature on the subject, there is a large interest in the incorporation of biologically derived macromolecules. Examples include enzymes to decrease the energy demand of nanocellulose production, proteins and other molecules for development of bioactive cellulose, and novel materials. In these fields, chemical stability, (anti)fouling properties, swelling, and water resistance are central aspects that affect the full realization of these approaches involving proteins in their various forms.
References
Spence K, Venditti R, Rojas O, Habibi Y, Pawlak J (2011) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18:1097–1111
Josefsson P, Henriksson G, Wågberg L (2008) The physical action of cellulases revealed by a quartz crystal microbalance study using ultrathin cellulose films and pure cellulases. Biomacromolecules 9:249–254
Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441
Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–1941
Satyamurthy P, Jain P, Balasubramanya RH, Vigneshwaran N (2011) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanowhiskers from cotton fibres by controlled microbial hydrolysis. Carbohydr Polym 83:122–129
Filson PB, Dawson-Andoh B, Schwegler-Berry D (2009) Enzymatic-mediated production of cellulose nanocrystals from recycled pulp. Green Chem 11:1808–1814
Satyamurthy P, Vigneshwaran N (2013) A novel process for synthesis of spherical nanocellulose by controlled hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose using anaerobic microbial consortium. Enzym Microb Technol 52:20–25
Hayashi N, Kondo T, Ishihara M (2005) Enzymatically produced nano-ordered short elements containing cellulose Iβ crystalline domains. Carbohydr Polym 61:191–197
George J, Ramana KV, Bawa AS, Siddaramaiah (2011) Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals exhibiting high thermal stability and their polymer nanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol 48:50–57
Zhu JY, Sabo R, Luo X (2011) Integrated production of nano-fibrillated cellulose and cellulosic biofuel (ethanol) by enzymatic fractionation of wood fibers. Green Chem 13:1339–1344
Siqueira G, Tapin-Lingua S, Bras J, da Silva Perez D, Dufresne A (2010) Morphological investigation of nanoparticles obtained from combined mechanical shearing, and enzymatic and acid hydrolysis of sisal fibers. Cellulose 17:1147–1158
Siqueira G, Tapin-Lingua S, Bras J, da Silva Perez D, Dufresne A (2011) Mechanical properties of natural rubber nanocomposites reinforced with cellulosic nanoparticles obtained from combined mechanical shearing, and enzymatic and acid hydrolysis of sisal fibers. Cellulose 18:57–65
Janardhnan S, Sain M (2006) Isolation of cellulose microfibrils – an enzymatic approach. Bioresources 1(2):176–188
Ong E, Gilkes NR, Warren RAJ, Miller RC, Kilburn DG (1989) Enzyme immobilization using the cellulose-binding domain of a Cellulomonas fimi exoglucanase. Nat Biotechnol 7:604–607
Arola S, Tammelin T, Setälä H, Tullila A, Linder MB (2012) Immobilization–stabilization of proteins on nanofibrillated cellulose derivatives and their bioactive film formation. Biomacromolecules 13:594–603
Orelma H, Filpponen I, Johansson L, Österberg M, Rojas OJ, Laine J (2012) Surface functionalized nanofibrillar cellulose (NFC) film as a platform for immunoassays and diagnostics. Biointerphases 7:61
Zhang Y, Carbonell RG, Rojas OJ (2013) Bioactive cellulose nanofibrils for specific human IgG binding. Biomacromolecules 14:4161–4168
Mahmoud KA, Male KB, Hrapovic S, Luong JHT (2009) Cellulose nanocrystal/gold nanoparticle composite as a matrix for enzyme immobilization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1:1383–1386
Incani V, Danumah C, Boluk Y (2013) Nanocomposites of nanocrystalline cellulose for enzyme immobilization. Cellulose 20:191–200
Sannino A, Demitri C, Madaghiele M (2009) Biodegradable cellulose-based hydrogels: design and applications. Mater 2:353–373
Anirudhan TS, Tharun AR, Rejeena SR (2011) Investigation on poly(methacrylic acid)-grafted cellulose/bentonite superabsorbent composite: synthesis, characterization, and adsorption characteristics of bovine serum albumin. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:1866–1874
Anirudhan TS, Rejeena SR (2012) Adsorption and hydrolytic activity of trypsin on a carboxylate-functionalized cation exchanger prepared from nanocellulose. J Colloid Interface Sci 381:125–136
Anirudhan TS, Rejeena SR (2013) Selective adsorption of hemoglobin using polymer-grafted-magnetite nanocellulose composite. Carbohydr Polym 93:518–527
Kolakovic R, Peltonen L, Laukkanen A, Hellman M, Laaksonen P, Linder MB, Hirvonen J, Laaksonen T (2013) Evaluation of drugs interactions with nanofibrillar cellulose. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 85(3):1238–1244
Salas C, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Hubbe MA, Genzer J (2012) Adsorption of glycinin and β-conglycinin on silica and cellulose: surface interactions as a function of denaturation, pH, and electrolytes. Biomacromolecules 13:387–396
Wei Q, Becherer T, Angioletti-Uberti S, Dzubiella J, Wischke C, Neffe AT, Lendlein A, Ballauff M, Haag R (2014) Protein interactions with polymer coatings and biomaterials. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:8004–8031
Kuzmenko V, Sämfors S, Hägg D, Gatenholm P (2013) Universal method for protein bioconjugation with nanocellulose scaffolds for increased cell adhesion. Mater Sci Eng C 33:4599–4607
Valo H, Arola S, Laaksonen P, Torkkeli M, Peltonen L, Linder MB, Serimaa R, Kuga S, Hirvonen J, Laaksonen T (2013) Drug release from nanoparticles embedded in four different nanofibrillar cellulose aerogels. Eur J Pharm Sci 50:69–77
Bhattacharya M, Malinen MM, Lauren P, Lou Y, Kuisma SW, Kanninen L, Lille M, Corlu A, GuGuen-Guillouzo C, Ikkala O, Laukkanen A, Urtti A, Yliperttula M (2012) Nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel promotes three-dimensional liver cell culture. J Control Release 164:291–298
Lou Y, Kanninen L, Kuisma T, Niklander J, Noon LA, Burks D, Urtti A, Yliperttula M (2014) The use of nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel as a flexible three-dimensional model to culture human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 23:380–392
Pretzel D, Linss S, Ahrem H, Endres M, Kaps C, Klemm D, Kinne R (2013) A novel in vitro bovine cartilage punch model for assessing the regeneration of focal cartilage defects with biocompatible bacterial nanocellulose. Arthritis Res Ther 15:R59
Feldmann E, Sundberg J, Bobbili B, Schwarz S, Gatenholm P, Rotter N (2013) Description of a novel approach to engineer cartilage with porous bacterial nanocellulose for reconstruction of a human auricle. J Biomater Appl 28:626–640
Ahrem H, Pretzel D, Endres M, Conrad D, Courseau J, Müller H, Jaeger R, Kaps C, Klemm DO, Kinne RW (2014) Laser-structured bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels support ingrowth and differentiation of chondrocytes and show potential as cartilage implants. Acta Biomater 10:1341–1353
Malinen MM, Kanninen LK, Corlu A, Isoniemi HM, Lou Y, Yliperttula ML, Urtti AO (2014) Differentiation of liver progenitor cell line to functional organotypic cultures in 3D nanofibrillar cellulose and hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels. Biomaterials 35:5110–5121
Müller A, Wesarg F, Hessler N, Müller FA, Kralisch D, Fischer D (2014) Loading of bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels with proteins using a high-speed technique. Carbohydr Polym 106:410–413
Chang S, Chen L, Lin S, Chen H (2012) Nano-biomaterials application: morphology and physical properties of bacterial cellulose/gelatin composites via crosslinking. Food Hydrocoll 27:137–144
Arboleda JC, Hughes M, Lucia LA, Laine J, Ekman K, Rojas OJ (2013) Soy protein-nanocellulose composite aerogels. Cellulose 20:2417–2426
Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK (2014) Effect of modified cellulose nanocrystals on microstructural and mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol/ovalbumin biocomposite scaffolds. Mater Lett 129:61–64
Wang Y, Chen L (2014) Cellulose nanowhiskers and fiber alignment greatly improve mechanical properties of electrospun prolamin protein fibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1709–1718
Orelma H, Morales LO, Johansson L, Hoeger IC, Filpponen I, Castro C, Rojas OJ, Laine J (2014) Affibody conjugation onto bacterial cellulose tubes and bioseparation of human serum albumin. RSC Adv 4:51440–51450
Lynch I, Salvati A, Dawson KA (2009) Protein-nanoparticle interactions: what does the cell see? Nat Nanotechnol 4:546–547
Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S (2001) Bacterial synthesized cellulose-artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci 26:1561–1603
Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P (2005) Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26:419–431
Bäckdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Johansson BR, Risberg B, Gatenholm P (2006) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:2141–2149
Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM (2007) The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8:1–12
Helenius G, Bäckdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B (2006) In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A 76A:431–438
Karaaslan MA, Gao G, Kadla JF (2013) Nanocrystalline cellulose/β-casein conjugated nanoparticles prepared by click chemistr. Cellulose 20:2655–2665
Kleinman HK, Luckenbill-Edds L, Cannon FW, Sephel GC (1987) Use of extracellular matrix components for cell culture. Anal Biochem 166:1–13
Yeh H-Y, Lin J-C (2008) Surface characterization and in vitro platelet compatibility study of surface sulfonated chitosan membrane with amino group protection–deprotection strategy. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 19:291–310
López-Pérez PM, da Silva RMP, Serra C, Pashkuleva I, Reis RL (2010) Surface phosphorylation of chitosan significantly improves osteoblast cell viability, attachment and proliferation. J Mater Chem 20:483–491
Kalia S, Boufi S, Celli A, Kango S (2014) Nanofibrillated cellulose: surface modification and potential applications. Colloid Polym Sci 292:5–31
Jaušovec D, Vogrinčič R, Kokol V (2015) Introduction of aldehyde vs. Carboxylic groups to cellulose nanofibers using laccase/TEMPO mediated oxidation. Carbohydr Polym 116:74–85
Aracri E, Vidal T (2012) Enhancing the effectiveness of a laccase-TEMPO treatment has a biorefining effect on sisal cellulose fibres. Cellulose 19:867–877
Li Z, Renneckar S, Barone JR (2010) Nanocomposites prepared by in situ enzymatic polymerization of phenol with TEMPO-oxidized nanocellulose. Cellulose 17:57–68
Garcia-Ubasart J, Vidal T, Torres AL, Rojas OJ (2013) Laccase-mediated coupling of nonpolar chains for the hydrophobization of lignocellulose. Biomacromolecules 14:1637–1644
Cusola O, Roncero MB, Vidal T, Rojas OJ (2014) A facile and green method to hydrophobize films of cellulose nanofibrils and silica by laccase-mediated coupling of nonpolar colloidal particles. ChemSusChem 7:2868–2878
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fritz, C., Jeuck, B., Salas, C., Gonzalez, R., Jameel, H., Rojas, O.J. (2015). Nanocellulose and Proteins: Exploiting Their Interactions for Production, Immobilization, and Synthesis of Biocompatible Materials. In: Rojas, O. (eds) Cellulose Chemistry and Properties: Fibers, Nanocelluloses and Advanced Materials. Advances in Polymer Science, vol 271. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2015_322
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2015_322
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26013-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26015-0
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)